-
12th November 05, 05:43 AM
#1
Kilt jacket for $25
Now that I have your attention with the subject line, here is a photo of a Harris Tweed sportscoat I had cut down to a kilt jacket. The alteration shop just charged me $25 for the work. I got the jacket for free -- it was a thrift store friend of a friend of mine who thought I would like it. I doubt she paid more than $5 for it.
http://blog.albanach.org/2005/11/do-...lt-jacket.html
Aye,
Matt
-
12th November 05, 06:11 AM
#2
Thats a great look.When altering a jacket to wear with a kilt,where on the kilt should the bottom come to?Or is this a matter of personal preferance?
Armageddon was yesterday. Today we have real problem.
-
12th November 05, 06:58 AM
#3
OK...you got my attention
Matt,
Great looking jacket. We Scots are always looking for a good deal.
Heath Barkley
Clan Barclay International - Pres.
-
12th November 05, 08:55 AM
#4
Many people wonder about adding on features typical in standard "kilt jackets" such as guantlet cuffs, epaulettes, etc. I wasn't worried about these. I have them on my formal jacket, and they are fine, but this coat was for casual wear.
I absolutely agree with you there, but what about the front cut-away? I've always thought that to be an integral part of any kilt jacket's design.
Edit: Make that "traditional / semi-traditional-kilt jacket, i.e. worn with a sporran.
Last edited by Iolaus; 12th November 05 at 11:05 AM.
Jeff Free people are not equal, and equal people are not free.An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it. An armed society is a polite society.
-
12th November 05, 10:58 AM
#5
I agree with Iolaus - it needs a cutaway. Look how it falls over top of your sporran.
Otherwise, it's money well spent, indeed. I did something similar a couple years ago. I had a seamstress turn a pair of Dockers into golf knickers. The cuffs were frayed, anyway, and those knickers are WAY overpriced.
-
12th November 05, 12:32 PM
#6
It could use a cutaway, you are right. I just neglected to mention that to the seamstress. When I don't have the jacket buttoned, it's not that much of an issue, so I'll probably just leave it as is.
M
-
12th November 05, 12:40 PM
#7
I'll probably just leave it as is.
Might as well. Spending $25.00 for a kilt jacket as opposed to well over $200.00 for some I've seen online is quite a deal considering the few people who will notice the difference.
-
12th November 05, 02:10 PM
#8
Hi Matt,
Was shortening of the overall length the only change made to the jacket?
At least one member of X-Marks had a jacket cut down and reported that the result looked odd because the lapels looked overly long. The lapels on your jacket look fine. Were the lapels altered?
-
12th November 05, 02:31 PM
#9
When I first read the subject line, I was hoping that Matt was starting to sell jackets for $25.00.
Yet it is a great reminder for all of us to keep an eye out for some fantastic bargains, at many unexpected places. (Even some expected places).
Glen
A Life Lived in Fear, Is a Life Half Lived.
Kilted With Pride!!!
-
12th November 05, 02:49 PM
#10
 Originally Posted by GMan
When I first read the subject line, I was hoping that Matt was starting to sell jackets for $25.00.
Yet it is a great reminder for all of us to keep an eye out for some fantastic bargains, at many unexpected places. (Even some expected places).
Too right Glen! I did a blog on that subject today.
With apologies to Matt for showing off my jacket in his thread ...
http://macbitseach.blogspot.com/
Kilts are garments, not costumes!
The MacBitseach Himself!
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks