-
11th January 07, 08:03 AM
#1
There's something about these kilts
This photo was taken at my piping instructor's New Year's Eve party. I'm not sure what I was doing in this shot. That's my instructor with his back to the camera. Every year we get together and at midnight whatever band members are there go out in the street and play in front of his house. The neighbors have come to expect it.

I was looking through some pictures from last week's party and noticed something interesting about the kilts in this one. Can you spot it? There may not be enough to see, but it's worth a try. I'll post the answer later today.
A side note: I had just got the dirk for Christmas and I had to wear it.
-
11th January 07, 08:06 AM
#2
-
11th January 07, 08:16 AM
#3
Good try, but that's not it. There definitely isn't enough of the kilts in the picture to make that out. These are both traditional kilts made in Scotland. They have something in common that I think will surprise most people.
Last edited by Planopiper; 11th January 07 at 08:31 AM.
-
11th January 07, 08:17 AM
#4
-
11th January 07, 08:23 AM
#5
It's the same tartan. Probably from 2 different mills. I'm guessing his is from Lochcarron.
Convener, Georgia Chapter, House of Gordon (Boss H.O.G.)
Where 4 Scotsmen gather there'll usually be a fifth.
7/5 of the world's population have a difficult time with fractions.
-
11th January 07, 08:33 AM
#6
The kilt concealed a blaster strapped to his thigh. Lazarus Long
-
11th January 07, 08:38 AM
#7
Well, that was too quick. Yes. They are both Ancient Caledonian. The colors don't always look the same in a picture as they do in real life. Next to each other these kilts don't look at all alike.
I don't know where the fabric was woven. My kilt was made by Burnetts and Struth. The other was by someone else. I have a picture of both next to each other so you can see them better, but it's not where I can upload it right now. I was surprised by how much difference there is in the two, even though they are both supposed to be the same. The main difference is that in Bob's kilt the blue is very pale. The red is also more of an orange in mine. It just goes to show that you can't just ask for a tartan thinking you know what it looks like. I have another piece of Ancient Caledonian that I bought to use as a great kilt. The sett is smaller than in this kilt and the red is more red, less orange. Otherwise, it's pretty close to my kilt, but still different enough if I had been hoping to get something that matched exactly.
-
11th January 07, 08:39 AM
#8
I'm with Turpin - tartan is Caledonia and mills are Lochcarron and House of Edgar?
EDIT...
A day late and a dollar short - again!
Phil in Idaho
"Walk Tall, Walk Straight, and Look the World Right in the Eye."
That Great Celtic Philosopher Val Doonican
-
11th January 07, 09:57 AM
#9
The sett (size of the pattern) of the tartan will be smaller on a 13 oz kilt that a 16 oz kilt, the heavier the material, the larger the sett.
Tiaraidh an drasda, Jim
Georgia, Alabama and Tennessee Commissioner, Clan Lamont Society of NA; Member:Clan Lamont, Clan Campbell, Clan Blair Societies and the St. Andrew's Society
-
11th January 07, 11:16 AM
#10
Here's the picture of both fabrics. Both are labeled Ancient Caledonian.

The sett size isn't important. It's the difference in colors that I found so surprising.
Similar Threads
-
By Beery in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 17
Last Post: 7th September 08, 12:40 PM
-
By yoippari in forum Kilt Advice
Replies: 26
Last Post: 1st June 07, 01:51 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks