-
19th April 10, 10:41 AM
#11
16oz....5.5 yard...HOE....vendor Tartan4Less
-
22nd April 10, 02:44 AM
#12
General Kilt Talk A place to discuss old kilts, new kilts, red kilts, blue kilts...
As I see it, the OP is discussing his new kilt. I don't think we need to rules-lawyer this one and put a damper on his excitement, do we? 
If I had just received that kilt, I'd be pretty darned proud of it too. Very handsome indeed! Thank you for sharing!
Duos habet et bene pendentes!
-
22nd April 10, 03:19 AM
#13
Has this thread been moved here to General Kilt Talk? If not, why is this the wrong forum?
Best Regards John
“... I can't think of an instrument less suited to 'Silent Night' than bagpipes... I mean, there's no question of silence in the night anymore once that GHB kicks in, is there? ..." ... Klondike Waldo
-
22nd April 10, 04:53 AM
#14
This thread was originally in the "Traditional" kilt forum, hence the suggestions that it might best fit into a different category. Seems like it has been moved now, and I don't think anyone would have any objections over it being in the General section.
-
22nd April 10, 08:42 AM
#15
Sorry for the confusion...I guess there are different interpretations of 'Traditional' kilt. I only put in in traditional b/c in my opinion, its a registered tartan, and I dont consider it to be a modern kilt. I guess I was just excited to post my pics to see which forum would be best....Thank you CDNSushie for understanding my excitement...I didn't realize that some may be offended that it is not to belong in the traditional forum
-
22nd April 10, 09:31 AM
#16
I wouldn't worry too much about it. It's a good looking kilt just the same, enjoy it and wear it with pride! 
Brian
Brian Woodyard
In the lowlands of Maryland
Fear Colgach Fear Baolach
A angry Man (is) A dangerous Man
-
22nd April 10, 11:09 AM
#17
I don't think anyone was offended. People just made the suggestion that this thread didn't really fit the criteria for the "traditional" forum. The Lionheart kilt, like other emblem or novelty kilts, is a more contemporary fashion. That's all anyone was saying.
-
22nd April 10, 06:39 PM
#18
Ah. That explains it then. Thanks for clearing it up, Matt. I guess it just goes to show that everyone's definition of "traditional" is a bit different. In this case it was obviously taken to mean a tartan kilt, as opposed to say, a Utilikilt.
Duos habet et bene pendentes!
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks