X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.

   X Marks Partners - (Go to the Partners Dedicated Forums )
Closed Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12
  1. #1
    Join Date
    23rd January 04
    Posts
    2,225

    What's better... a p-v casual for $125 or a wool formal for $150

    This topic is for Brother Jimmy.

    It is a tough call. The tailor made PV will probably fit better than a mass produced wool .
    Last edited by Raphael; 22nd September 05 at 07:56 PM.
    Chinese Blood, Kilted Heart, One United.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    3rd January 05
    Location
    Detoit, Michigan USA
    Posts
    3,775
    OK! OK! I'll bite!


    Put me down for a wool!
    Paul Murray
    Kilted in Detroit! Now that's tough.... LOL
    | []FOL #277558[/URL] | Celebrities in Kilts!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    15th March 05
    Posts
    107

    Fabric snob

    Indeed! In an ideal world, wool would be the only fabric from which a kilt would be made.

    My the way, from where can I get a wool kilt for $150? Please let me know.
    Last edited by jkdesq; 23rd September 05 at 10:15 AM. Reason: forgot part of it

  4. #4
    Join Date
    17th August 05
    Location
    Littleton, CO
    Posts
    513
    Quote Originally Posted by jkdesq
    Indeed! In an ideal world, wool would be the only fabric from which a kilt would be made.
    ..and every morning, the ideal wool kilt would be magically cleaned and pressed and hanging in the closet waiting for us :grin: .

    Bryan...just one of the finer points in my ideal world...
    Myth is often just a name for forgotten history. (Mac Liag, bard to Boru)

  5. #5
    Join Date
    23rd January 04
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    2,030
    Raphael... you sneak.

    What was once a purely hypothetical question has now come to light.

    I, myself, am partial to wool casuals that are sewn with hidden stitching and ride on the hip... but that wasn't an option.

    I will say, however, that there's nothing more comfortable and strong as a nicely woven and soft wool.
    Last edited by Jimmy Carbomb; 23rd September 05 at 10:16 AM. Reason: typos out the wazzoo!

  6. #6
    arrogcow's Avatar
    arrogcow is offline This member has been inactive for more than 1 year
    Join Date
    24th October 04
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    1,401
    Quote Originally Posted by jkdesq
    Indeed! In an ideal world, wool would be the only fabric from which a kilt would be made.
    Gotta dissagree. While I love wool, not really practical when wood working, HEAVY gardning or in 90+degree 90% humidity.

    Adam

  7. #7
    Join Date
    28th June 05
    Location
    Lookout Mountain
    Posts
    483
    oioi. i've had to change out of my SW several times because my legs were sweating so bad.

    i know it's not wool, but it's quite cozy nonetheless. and cozy is something i don't really need at 2 in the afternoon in september.

    I'm going for something cooler for my next kilt.

    We shall not cease from exploration/ And the end of all our exploring/ Will be to arrive where we started/ And know the place for the first time. <><

  8. #8
    Join Date
    23rd January 04
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    2,030
    I have a number of kilts that are made out of a lighter wool material, and they're no more "insulating" than anything else out there. In fact, I find that they breathe well, don't blow-up in a breeze, and handwash in no time. I wear them under the lights, and never feel like a burger at McDonald's. There ARE more than one or two weights and weaves in wool.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    27th January 05
    Location
    Jefferson, Georgia, USA
    Posts
    3,502
    I think we would all love to have a great wool kilt in our kollections. I know I would. But as has been discussed in other threads the weight and heat of a tank is not typically practical in Georgia. I think I will get more use out of a PV kilt for daily wear.

    BUT.... If there were a wool kilt available in a wide selection of tartans pleated to stripe for $150.... I'd be all over it!!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    15th August 04
    Posts
    2,976
    The correct answer of course, is both.

    If you buy both, you are still spending less than what an actual "tank" would cost.

Closed Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0