|
-
10th February 09, 08:56 PM
#1
 Originally Posted by fortcollinsjerry
As a Crawford, I am a Sept of Clan Lindsay. It's noted on the Clan Lindsay web site that the Lindsay Coat of Arms is the exclusive property of a Lord Crawford and only members of his family may wear the Coat. I'm confused and need edification.
1. As a Crawford may I wear the Arms or must I ask The Lords permission?
2. Who is the Lord and where does he live? Would he think me presumptuous to ask? I don't know Scottish social rules.
The Chief of the Clan Lindsay is The Rt. Hon The Earl of Crawford and Balcarres. A good place to find out something about Lord Crawford is this article on Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_...rl_of_Crawford
-
-
11th February 09, 06:11 AM
#2
 Originally Posted by teamCrawford
I would be more inclined to wear proudly the clan crest, which is not governed by so many rules of protocol.
Actually, the clansman's badge is governed by the rules of protocol, because it is actually the crest of the clan chief. The buckle-and-strap device around the crest signifies that the wearer is a clansman/woman of the Chief. Clan members may not use the clansman's badge as their own, i.e. on stationary, without recognising that the badge "belongs" to the Chief.
Oops! I see Sandford already posted something similar, but it still bears repeating.
Regards,
Todd
-
-
11th February 09, 02:06 PM
#3
This is very intersting. So all of the clan badges and doo dads that are sold bearing family crests need permission as well? I did not know that and I don't think a lot of people know this. I mean they can be ordered from just about any Scottish goods place. My brother has a cap badge with the Crawford family crest and there is one on the cap of his skein dubh as well. We didn't know one needed specific permission to wear these.
This is all very interesting reading. I knew the coats of arms were pretty much personal property, but I didn't know the mass produced crest items were as well. I can find objects like my avatar so many places.
-
-
11th February 09, 02:21 PM
#4
 Originally Posted by teamCrawford
This is very intersting. So all of the clan badges and doo dads that are sold bearing family crests need permission as well? I did not know that and I don't think a lot of people know this. I mean they can be ordered from just about any Scottish goods place. My brother has a cap badge with the Crawford family crest and there is one on the cap of his skein dubh as well. We didn't know one needed specific permission to wear these.
This is all very interesting reading. I knew the coats of arms were pretty much personal property, but I didn't know the mass produced crest items were as well. I can find objects like my avatar so many places.
Whilst you do not need permission to wear a clansman's badge, many people make the assumption that the badge belongs to the surname, when in fact, it belongs to the Chief, since the crest comes from the Chief's arms. That was what Sandford and I were getting at.
The following document from the Society of Scottish Armiger's web site (in .pdf format) will explain the traditions surrounding the clansman's badge:
http://www.scotarmigers.net/pdfs/info-leaflet-2.pdf
Regards,
Todd
-
-
11th February 09, 02:24 PM
#5
I posted this in another thread, but since it is germane to this thread's topic, I'll post it here as well:
Unfortunately this has led to the recent misunderstanding (primarily in the Southeastern US) that the Crawford surname is a sept of Clan Lindsay, which according to the Lyon Court is inherently inappropriate, in stark disagreement with the more accurate and appropriate Clan Lindsay International and Clan Lindsay Australia who acknowledge merely an ally relationship. Regardless of competing unsupported claims, the Lyon Court recognizes the Crawford surname as an independent armigerous House with a Senior Line (unofficial Chiefs) having for centuries registered Arms showing no differencing [except internal to cadets of the House and an honorary augmentation] or allegiance to another clan, house, or surname, this being the ultimate legal test of independence (not a sept). Nevertheless, we do appreciate a fellowship of parity from any clan or association.
-- http://www.clancrawford.org/
Regards,
Todd
-
-
11th February 09, 06:57 PM
#6
Thank you very much for clarifying what you were saying. It makes perfect sense to me now. I apologise to fortcollins for hijacking his thread. But I understand now.
I learned that the Crawfords were not really a sept of the Lindsays a few years back. However, I couldn't remember enough of the information to feel I could make a decent post to fortcollins about said situation. Thank you for that as well.
-
-
11th February 09, 08:14 PM
#7
Be a trend setter - make up your own crest and coats of arms
-
Similar Threads
-
By Alan H in forum Show us your pics
Replies: 21
Last Post: 14th November 08, 11:19 AM
-
By Alan H in forum DIY Showroom
Replies: 10
Last Post: 29th January 07, 06:59 PM
-
By Galant in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 20
Last Post: 22nd June 05, 04:29 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks