X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.

   X Marks Partners - (Go to the Partners Dedicated Forums )
USA Kilts website Celtic Croft website Celtic Corner website Houston Kiltmakers

User Tag List

Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Join Date
    11th October 12
    Location
    Groningen, Netherlands
    Posts
    10
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    By Appointment to the late King George V kilt

    Hello,

    Out of historical interest i'm offered a kilt of W M Anderson & Sons Ltd
    The label says: By Appointment to the late King George V"

    My questions are:
    -when was such a label introduced? in 1936 when the king died?
    -how long would such a label be used in kilts?

    In this link it states that W M Anderson & Sons Ltd could use this kind of label from 1940 onwards
    https://www.thegazette.co.uk/Edinbur...e/476/data.pdf

    So my real queation would be in which time period this kilt would probably be made?

    thanks in advance

    rene

  2. #2
    Join Date
    11th October 12
    Location
    Groningen, Netherlands
    Posts
    10
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Kiltlabel By Appointment to the late King George V

    Double post, please delete thanks in advance rene
    Last edited by berend; 4th March 15 at 01:19 PM. Reason: double post

  3. #3
    Join Date
    6th July 07
    Location
    The Highlands,Scotland.
    Posts
    15,337
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    As I understand it, the convention is that A Royal Warrant holder may use the title for 5 years after the death of, in this case, King George V. It is also quite correct in that circumstance for the Warrant holder to use the term "the Late King George V". I have no idea when Anderson & Sons received their accolade, but it would have been anytime prior to The King's(George V) death, but going on what I think happens, then any new kilt from Anderson & Sons, would have been correctly labeled thus until sometime in1941.
    Last edited by Jock Scot; 4th March 15 at 06:06 PM. Reason: clarified a point.
    " Rules are for the guidance of wise men and the adherence of idle minds and minor tyrants". Field Marshal Lord Slim.

  4. The Following 2 Users say 'Aye' to Jock Scot For This Useful Post:


  5. #4
    Join Date
    18th October 09
    Location
    Orange County California
    Posts
    10,580
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks for the info, because I have an Anderson catalogue with that title.

    I didn't know that the Royal Warrant holder could use the title for 5 years.

    I had assumed that they would only use that title until they received a new Royal Warrant from the new Monarch.

    I have another Anderson catalogue, more recent, I assume around 1950, which has

    By Appointment
    Tailors and Kiltmakers
    To His Majesty The King

    and within it is a price list dated 1957, which has:

    By Appointment
    To HM The Queen
    Tailors and Kiltmakers

    By Appointment
    To HRH The Duke of Edinburgh
    Tailors and Kiltmakers
    Proud Mountaineer from the Highlands of West Virginia; son of the Revolution and Civil War; first Europeans on the Guyandotte

  6. #5
    Join Date
    6th July 07
    Location
    The Highlands,Scotland.
    Posts
    15,337
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by OC Richard View Post
    Thanks for the info, because I have an Anderson catalogue with that title.

    I didn't know that the Royal Warrant holder could use the title for 5 years.

    I had assumed that they would only use that title until they received a new Royal Warrant from the new Monarch.

    I have another Anderson catalogue, more recent, I assume around 1950, which has

    By Appointment
    Tailors and Kiltmakers
    To His Majesty The King

    and within it is a price list dated 1957, which has:

    By Appointment
    To HM The Queen
    Tailors and Kiltmakers

    By Appointment
    To HRH The Duke of Edinburgh
    Tailors and Kiltmakers
    As I understand it and to be clear here, the Royal Warrant Holder can display the Warrant from the time it was issued by a particular Monarch and can display it for 5 years after that particular Monarch's death.

    There is no automatic right for the succeeding Monarch to issue a new Warrant to an existing holder. Although I think many are Honoured with a new Royal Warrant from a new Monarch, but there is no guarantee.
    " Rules are for the guidance of wise men and the adherence of idle minds and minor tyrants". Field Marshal Lord Slim.

  7. #6
    Join Date
    23rd December 14
    Location
    California
    Posts
    163
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Interestingly enough, in Japan, there seems (at least in some cases) to be a convention of a "warrant holder" (if you will) having the right to pass it down in the family, through succeeding generations of both the business and the monarchy it serves.

    For example, the late headmaster of my school of archery bore the appointment "bowmaker to the emperor", as does his successor (his son-in-law, carrying on the family business), as did the three previous generations of the family, going back to the late 1800s.

    I am not sure whether this represents a case where each new emperor chose to appoint the current head of that same family to the position, or if the position was simply inherited within the family and confirmed by lack of the current emperor saying anything to the contrary.

    (That being said, the appointment holder does have a specific duty, which involves crafting a new set of fifty-nine ceremonial bows every twenty years for the Ise Grand Shrine; most of the individual appointment holders seem to get to do it twice in their tenure, but there doesn't seem to have ever been any question about whose job it was at any given time.)


    On the other hand, this appointment doesn't seem to be used as an advertising or promotional statement in the business of purveying the goods to the public.

  8. #7
    Join Date
    18th March 13
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    261
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Jock Scot View Post
    As I understand it and to be clear here, the Royal Warrant Holder can display the Warrant from the time it was issued by a particular Monarch and can display it for 5 years after that particular Monarch's death.
    I don't have a bottle handy, but isn't there a Royal Warrant for several past monarchs (or members of the royal family) on a couple of different Whiskies? And also Tanqueray or Bombay Sapphire? Is there a distinction made between the Warrant of a monarch, and the Warrant of (for example) HRH The Prince of Wales?

    I'm curious how this works, and while I'm sure Jock Scot has more experience in this matter, if there is a formal convention relating to it.

    As somewhat of a postscript, I have a Fribourg and Treyer snuff tin (from a couple of years ago) which has the Royal Warrant for "Their late Majesties The Kings of Hanover and Belgium".

    Interesting topic!

    Cheers,

    Cameron
    I can't understand why people are frightened by new ideas. I'm frightened by old ones. John Cage

  9. #8
    Join Date
    6th July 07
    Location
    The Highlands,Scotland.
    Posts
    15,337
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Manxstralian View Post
    I don't have a bottle handy, but isn't there a Royal Warrant for several past monarchs (or members of the royal family) on a couple of different Whiskies? And also Tanqueray or Bombay Sapphire? Is there a distinction made between the Warrant of a monarch, and the Warrant of (for example) HRH The Prince of Wales?

    I'm curious how this works, and while I'm sure Jock Scot has more experience in this matter, if there is a formal convention relating to it.

    As somewhat of a postscript, I have a Fribourg and Treyer snuff tin (from a couple of years ago) which has the Royal Warrant for "Their late Majesties The Kings of Hanover and Belgium".

    Interesting topic!

    Cheers,

    Cameron
    I am no expert, not even half a one on this matter! Royal Warrants in the UK are/ have been issued by the Prince of Wales, Duke of Edinburgh and one I remember well from HM the Queen Mother over the door of Haggarts the tweed maker from Aberfeldy. Each warrant is differenced by the Coat of Arms of the particular "Royal" that issued it. I have even less of an idea how Royal Warrants from outside of the UK work though.

    The Trade Labels inside British gunmakers gun cases, particularly from the pre WW2 era, are fertile areas to see worldwide Royal Coats of Arms from the Warrants issued by satisfied Royal customers(google trade labels British gun makers and click on images), but anything from jam makers, candlestick makers to gunmakers, fishing tackle makers to Jewellers and kilt makers have to my knowledge held Royal Warrants over time.

    I have no doubt whatsoever that there is, somewhere, a very strict and formal set of rules covering this issue, so please do not take my meagre interpretation on these matters as anything other than broad brush.
    Last edited by Jock Scot; 25th March 15 at 02:44 AM.
    " Rules are for the guidance of wise men and the adherence of idle minds and minor tyrants". Field Marshal Lord Slim.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0