X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.

   X Marks Partners - (Go to the Partners Dedicated Forums )
USA Kilts website Freedom Kilts website Scotweb websiten Burnetts and Struth website The Scottish Trading Company
Xmarks advertising information Celtic Croft website Xmarks advertising information Celtic Corner website Xmarks advertising information

User Tag List

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 23 of 23
  1. #21
    Join Date
    24th January 17
    Location
    Ellan Vannin
    Posts
    282
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Just 5o put 5he cat amongst the pigeons but as far as I can see the most significant portion of 5he firld is already under NT ownership and culloden has had a fair few expensive visitors centres in its time.

    So why should Culloden be any more worthy of preservation 5han say Flodden which I would consider as a far more of a loss for the Scottish nation as a whole (ok it is in Northern England so maybe tha5 makes a difference) which has only a few boards & no visitors centre.

    Consider the alnost total silence on the other side of the story preceding the events leading to the glorious revolution (the persecution of Scottish Covrnantors by the Stuart Monarchy carried out with 5he support of Highland troops) which lead to the basis for the lowland resentment towards the highlander.

    So why should Culloden be more worthy of more funds than utilising those funds to provide a more balanced picture of Scottish history and perhaps recognising some of those equally historically significant sites?

  2. The Following User Says 'Aye' to Allan Thomson For This Useful Post:


  3. #22
    Join Date
    21st July 14
    Location
    Burien Washington USA
    Posts
    1,087
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Here is an interesting half hour video produced by some of the people behind the conservation effort. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7W4x...pc&app=desktop

  4. #23
    Join Date
    9th September 16
    Location
    Annapolis, Maryland (MD)
    Posts
    220
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Just because there are other sites that may be more "worthy" of being protected than Culloden doesn't mean that the Culloden effort should be stopped or redirected. Let it go on. If another site is important enough to someone or to the country as a whole then let someone else stand up and organize an effort for that site. No reason for the Culloden effort to be set aside because nobody else is stepping up for the other site(s).
    The hielan' man he wears the kilt, even when it's snowin';
    He kens na where the wind comes frae, But he kens fine where its goin'.

  5. The Following 3 Users say 'Aye' to lschwartz For This Useful Post:


Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0