-
21st May 12, 05:43 AM
#11
I may have to wear mine out for the next celtic festival here in Florida. I don't think mine has left the closet since I did IDPA... was sick of folks asking me if I was going fishing, or was a professional photog.
Have fun and throw far. In that order, too. - o1d_dude
-
-
21st May 12, 06:12 AM
#12
To me, those type of vests are all about the practicality and not so much about the aesthetic appeal. It's not that they look bad per se, rather they just seem to look like they prioritize function over form.
That being said, Seago Sensei tends to have good taste, so I'll reserve my judgment until I've seen pics of that type of vest worn with a kilt.
- Justitia et fortitudo invincibilia sunt
- An t'arm breac dearg
-
-
21st May 12, 06:30 AM
#13
I have such a vest and have worn it with a kilt. They are very practical.
Cheers
Jamie
-See it there, a white plume
Over the battle - A diamond in the ash
Of the ultimate combustion-My panache
Edmond Rostand
-
-
21st May 12, 06:39 AM
#14
-
-
21st May 12, 07:50 AM
#15
 Originally Posted by John McQuillen
I'm sure theres room in the world for a kind of kilted safari look though......
Well, we'll see in a couple of weeks. Two weeks from tomorrow, June 5th, my workplace is shutting down entirely and all staff are being taken out for a "fun day" up north: Lunch at Camp Newman up in Santa Rosa, followed by the rest of the day at nearby Safari West. I'm thinking the "Okavango Vest" would be a good pairing with a Douglas Weathered kilt. . .

 Originally Posted by Riverkilt
I do really really really like vests with a lot of pockets with kilts - for the convenience, the comfort, and for the look - though I wish someone would delve into the waiting niche market of travel vests cut a bit shorter for wearing with kilts.
Well, until then, this

looks like a great solution, as fishing or "wading vests" (and jackets) are typically cut a bit shorter. I think that ad photo you posted looks fantastic!! I think the Scottevests look quite decent, though, particularly worn unzipped, as they're no longer than an Argyle jacket. It's a matter of mindset: If you're thinking of it as a sleeveless jacket -- outerwear -- rather than as a differently-cut waistcoat, often worn under a jacket -- then I think it works well.
Last edited by Dale Seago; 21st May 12 at 07:51 AM.
"It's all the same to me, war or peace,
I'm killed in the war or hung during peace."
-
-
21st May 12, 08:03 AM
#16
I bought one of those things in a fit of photographic enthusiasm and the only time that it ever came in handy was when I was a new dad traveling with infant children...you could fir several disposable diapers in those cargo pockets and wipes and baby bottles fit nicely in the pockets designed for carrying lenses. Sorry, but it became very clear to me that these vests were certifiable nerd-wear and I had to quit wearing one. I have simply worn a regular fishing vest when I've gone out on "light" assignments and carried four compact 35mm cameras....actually a very good way to work sometimes.
The joke being that I very rarely wear the regular fishing vest when I'm fishing anymore...again, been down to de river when the crowd that just got out of Orvis with their brand new outfits showed up and didn't want to look like "one of them"....have to cultivate that trout-bum/I'm-one-of-the-locals look...got to the point where I know what I need to carry and don't need fifteen pockets full of stuff for every possible eventuality.
...but as Al Czervik sez in Caddyshack, "...oh...but it looks good on YOU though ."
Best
AA
ANOTHER KILTED LEBOWSKI AND...HEY, CAREFUL, MAN, THERE'S A BEVERAGE HERE!
-
-
21st May 12, 08:17 AM
#17
I've worn one of the wading style vests many times when hiking. I can't stand the idea of a sporran thumping in front of me as I'm trying to scramble up a hill, or as was the case a couple of weeks ago jumping across a section of a partially washed out bridge.
Heck, now that I've seen the idea has received Jock's seal of approval I may take it beyond the woods.
-
-
21st May 12, 08:35 AM
#18
I regularly wear one at TTITD (and every other time I visit the Black Rock or any of the great outdoor venues in Northern Nevada) and carry it in my car. It is my survival “bag”. I also have a ScottE Vest that I picked up at a thrift store and wear ala RiverKilt. The both go well with a kilt, but I wear them for the use, got the look
aka Scott Hudson, Mason,Minister, Eagle Scout, Vet, Teacher, Student, Piper, and Burner
Liberty starts with absolute rights over your own Body, Mind, Actions, and Earnings.
-
-
21st May 12, 08:43 AM
#19
In a word, "yes."

LeedsCastle-K by arcturus1997, on Flickr
I favor the photographer's version for its multitude of pockets.
Ken Sallenger - apprentice kiltmaker, journeyman curmudgeon,
gainfully unemployed systems programmer
-
-
21st May 12, 01:04 PM
#20
I picked a couple up at an Eddie Bauer Outlet store for a song and typically use them for travelling on airlines. You can stuff the pockets with all your metal gear and electronics and anything else the TSA might ask you to take out of your pockets (basically everything with those new whole body scanners), and all you have to do is take it off and throw in in a bin and then pick it up on the other side of the xray machine and put it back on. Good to go. Cell phones, MP3 players, pocket cameras, wallet, keys, pagers, change. chapstick, eyedrops, medications, pens, a good book, snacks--you can even toss your watch in one pocket.
They are also nice for light hiking where you don't really want to carry a backpack but do need to carry "stuff" (like a tired 4 year old). I have a couple shorties as well for fly fishing that stay loaded with all my gear and flyboxes, although those are a wee bit more specialized for fishing. Years ago I bought one with the intent on using it for photography, until I discovered that all those lenses and flashes and batteries and other accessories are pretty darn heavy, and I did not really like them banging around on my torso and each other every time I moved around, so I devolved back to a snug but plush and roomy fanny pack specifically designed for photography, and got more judicious about what I kept in it and what stayed in the bigger backpack to be available for those special occasions.
I see no reason why they should not be worn with the kilt, tartan or no, in the appropriate settings.
Last edited by ForresterModern; 21st May 12 at 01:06 PM.
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks