Is clan affiliation primarily along paternal lines?
I was taking stock of the kilts and tartans I currently own, along with one that is presently on order, and those that I plan to purchase as funds permit. I began wondering how history and tradition prioritize or define an "order of precedence" (if any) when affiliations with multiple tartans exist.
On my father's side of the family, I have the following affiliations:
Grandfather
`--- Great Grandfather = Buchanan
`--- Great Grandmother = Aberdeen District
Grandmother
`--- Great Grandfather = Ellis (of Wales)
`--- Great Grandmother = Lyons
I understand that any "Ellis of Wales" tartans are fashion industry creations with no historical significance. But among the other tartans, I am curious. Do history and tradition dictate that any one affiliation will normally displace any others? Is there some kind of "affiliation falls along paternal lines" rule? Or is it simply a matter of choice as to where tradition allows allegiances and ties to be prioritized?
I understand the contemporary and prevailing "wear whatever you want" opinions on here. But from a historical context, I'd be interested to hear what say The Rabble. Another opportunity for me to learn something about my heritage.
KEN CORMACK
Clan Buchanan
U.S. Coast Guard, Retired
Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, USA
Bookmarks