|
-
Kilt too Short... Apparently
In the last couple of weeks I have had two women tell me that my kilt was too short. One was probably in her eighties, the other was either late forties or maybe into her fifties. My kilts come to the top of the knee, right where I make them to go. Not too short.
The older woman said that it was too short and she should know as she was from Ayrshire.
The younger one said that it was too short and she apparently knew best as she said that she has Scottish heritage. She spoke with a Northwest English accent so that might or might not be true. She began to explain that thing about the kilt should touch the floor when kneeling. I told her that I was a kiltmaker and that I knew to what she was referring, but that I didn't do it that way. I got the impression that she didn't believe me (because of my American accent probably). She continued on so she could be right.
I didn't go into any more detail about why my kilt wasn't too short. Some people can't be told. I have come across people like this before, but never as close together as this.
How often doe this happen to others of the rabble?
-
The Following 6 Users say 'Aye' to Arnot For This Useful Post:
-
I have heard different opinions on kilt length: top of the knee, mid knee, bottom of the knee... I don't know if there is a consensus or if part of the debate is regional fashion when wearing a kilt.
At festivals I have on numerous occasions found myself talking to the sales people to see if the kilts they have a kilt long enough for my 6'5" tall self. The "standard" 22 or 24 inch drop does not work for some of us.
-
The Following 2 Users say 'Aye' to LKM For This Useful Post:
-
 Originally Posted by LKM
to see if the kilts they have a kilt long enough for my 6'5" tall self. The "standard" 22 or 24 inch drop does not work for some of us.
I feel your pain... 6'8"... I find that a 24" is good if worn at the trousers waist. Anything traditional waits height, and I go with custom made from somewhere like USA Kilts.
Never run or do jumping jacks while wearing a heavy sporran
"500 years before Christ was born, a highlander stepped on the bloated carcass of a sheep and the bagpipes were born"
Stabo (I shall stand)
-
The Following User Says 'Aye' to The TALL TN Scot For This Useful Post:
-
 Originally Posted by The TALL TN Scot
I feel your pain... 6'8"... I find that a 24" is good if worn at the trousers waist. Anything traditional waits height, and I go with custom made from somewhere like USA Kilts.
Aye I've found a 25" length is perfect for me, and it's lovely that USA Kilts has been able to accommodate that. Gives me a comfortable length and a good fit.
-
The Following User Says 'Aye' to Jumpmonkey For This Useful Post:
-
I just love it when Lowlanders and non Scots come up with those sorts of comments! 
I hear it about once or twice a year, from non locals. Its amazing to me that people from parts of the world that have historically had nothing to do with the Highland kilt and in fact have been, up to recently, quite hostile to it, on occasion, have all of a sudden become experts on kilt attire. Frankly, I don't know whether to laugh or cry.
Without I hope labouring the point, I do wonder if its partly due to the influence of the kilt hire fashion mentality at work outwith the Highlands of Scotland.
Last edited by Jock Scot; 29th May 18 at 06:09 AM.
" Rules are for the guidance of wise men and the adherence of idle minds and minor tyrants". Field Marshal Lord Slim.
-
The Following 19 Users say 'Aye' to Jock Scot For This Useful Post:
California Highlander,CameronCat,Father Bill,FossilHunter,Geoff Withnell,jfraser,jthk,jumary,Katzbalger,kiltedtom,kingandrew,MacRobert's Reply,Mike in Dayton,Mike S,Profane James,ThistleDown,tpa,tripleblessed,tundramanq
-
 Originally Posted by Jock Scot
Without I hope labouring the point, I do wonder if its partly due to the influence of the kilt hire fashion mentality at work outwith the Highlands of Scotland.
Funny you should say that as I did mention the kilt hire industry as where the younger woman might have gotten the idea.
-
The Following 4 Users say 'Aye' to Arnot For This Useful Post:
-
No expert here, but I prefer top of the knee. That way, if the kilt eases its way down a bit over the course of the day, it will still be at an acceptable mid-knee level. Bottom of the knee or lower and it just doesn't look good.
Holcombe
-
The Following 9 Users say 'Aye' to Holcombe Thomas For This Useful Post:
-
This is always a touchy subject. It is easy to find historical pictures that show the kilt being worn from below the knee to well above the knee. I can remember seeing a paining of two Highland officers walking across a park where their kilts were well above the knee. In addition, there are pictures of Prince Edward (before becoming king) where his kilt is below the knee.
In my humble opinion, what is the "correct" length is basically a point of fashion (driven by regimental regulations). Personally I feel the to the top of the knee is two short for me and normally wear mine at the mid-knee. However, because of my 24 pack abs (pot belly) my kilt hem seem to travel south a number of times during the day.
If you see abbreviations, initials or acronyms you do not know the Xmarks FAQ section on abbreviations may help.
www.xmarksthescot.com/forum/faq.php?faq=xmarks_faq#faq_faq_abbr
-
-
You think that's bad, I have the argument with my wife, who states that all of the people/pictures she sees are not as short as my kilt at the top of the knee.
"Oh so you are right and all of the others, many who are Scottish are wrong" is often her argument, if I'm being nice I'll just say yes, if she really pushes it I tell her to go forth and procreate (not very nice but she sometimes deserves it). This is typically followed by I'm as much Scottish as you ( we both have English dads and scots mothers) my answer being "yes but I was born and grew up in Scotland" and whilst it may not make a difference with some it certainly has with you.
People often wonder how we argue so much and have remained married for 30 years, I guess the answer is that we both like a good argument.
I have given in a bit and my next kilt will be mid knee, still too short she cried, I could have answered "gan and bile yer heed" but she wouldn't have got it. Mine will never come below mid knee as I'm a short **** with an inside leg of 29" and I don't think it looks good on me if any lower. Plus I wouldn't like to deprive the ladies at work who appreciate my legs, maybe that's the wife's real problem.
-
The Following 3 Users say 'Aye' to Nomad For This Useful Post:
-
15th June 18, 02:48 PM
#10
 Originally Posted by Friday
This is always a touchy subject. It is easy to find historical pictures that show the kilt being worn from below the knee to well above the knee. I can remember seeing a paining of two Highland officers walking across a park where their kilts were well above the knee. In addition, there are pictures of Prince Edward (before becoming king) where his kilt is below the knee.
In my humble opinion, what is the "correct" length is basically a point of fashion (driven by regimental regulations). Personally I feel the to the top of the knee is two short for me and normally wear mine at the mid-knee. However, because of my 24 pack abs (pot belly) my kilt hem seem to travel south a number of times during the day.
My understanding is that the long, mid-knee or below kilt came into its own in the Victorian era around the same time as the kilt pin. The concern was that the kilt would fall open in disarray, exposing the man to the public. The “solution”, then, was to lengthen the kilt and pin the aprons together.
I wear mine to the top of the knee, and unpinned.
-
The Following 2 Users say 'Aye' to RichardtheLarge For This Useful Post:
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks