When going regimental isn't an option

[CameronTaylor]

What would Jesus do?

... for a Klondike bar ? 8-)


CT -

[mbhandy]

It appears that I did, probably due to my advancing age and failing eyesight...;o)~
In any case I have been giving this much thought and I've come up with a silver lining to this thread. Since it seems acceptable for a woman to pursue a man in a kilt to get a look or a picture up under his kilt it seesm to me that it would be acceptable for a man to ascertain what a woman wears or is not wearing under a kilt if indeed she is wearing a mans kilt or am I wrong? If a woman has the total lack of class to wear a mans kilt, assuming that she isn't a dancer or piper, then she must understand that a kilt does not carry the same taboos as a womans skirt or dress. These are, after all de facto rules according to some women.

Chris. ;)

Oh yah try it and see what happens

nugh nugh wink wink know what I mean! I saw the wink after the name.

MrBill

[furrycelt]

Ian, I did stress "kilt", not something that looks like a womans' skirt

And I was referring to kilts by saying: "any unbifurcated garment". In fact, I was stressing that such "bad" churches would not know the difference between a kilt and a skirt. So, to be clearer: there *are* churches in the US that would deny a kilted man to enter, or at least not throw him out, but request that he not wear the kilt upon returning.

The tartan kilt is without question regarded as a male garment all around the world.

I wish that was the case. And I hope that someday that will be true.

-ian

[Rob Wright]

And I was referring to kilts by saying: "any unbifurcated garment". In fact, I was stressing that such "bad" churches would not know the difference between a kilt and a skirt. So, to be clearer: there *are* churches in the US that would deny a kilted man to enter, or at least not throw him out, but request that he not wear the kilt upon returning.




I wish that was the case. And I hope that someday that will be true.

-ian

You are correct, the southern baptist church here under it's previous minister would not let me in for any reason(i.e donating my time for charity work, or helping out with activities with family members or friends) if I was wearing my kilt, the current minister likes them and doesn't mind. Some church's here where I live are not known for their willingness to accept anything that does not fit their pre-concieved notions(Not having to do with theology).


Rob

[Niblox]

Rubbish, it doesn't matter what you wear under the kilt. I have always worn it regimental - to weddings, conferrings, formal dinners, etc. The advantage is that you stay comfortable. Unless you are competing in dancing or participating in highland games, you do not need underwear. In any event, even if you did wear it to church, who is going to ask you to let you inspect what is underneath it???

Niblox