Well, it's no surprise that traditionalists think the trends and ideas in the article are not traditional enough (thanks, Jock, for being dependable in holding the Highland line!). There is certainly something to be said for sticking to the classics that have stood the test of time

A couple people have found that, notwithstanding the poorly styled examples, some of the suggestions aren't bad. I'd still be interested to hear from people who self-identify as contemporary modernists? Such viewpoints are conspicuous by their absence...

I have a response to the article, but I thought I'd survey other interested members first.