A new twist on "The Question"

[Riverkilt]

Agree with the posts except the last. Have worked with sex offenders and rapists on probation for years (helps insure fewer victims are created).

Knowing what a true sex offender is, in my opinion a kilt groper - particularly a drunken kilt groper (aren't they all) would not qualify as a sex offender.

Just don't think a psychiatric evaluation would turn up the paraphilia of Frotteurism since to be diagnosed the person must have displayed the behavior over a period of at least six months.

For sure they'd easily meet the legal definition of assault, or sexual assault, in most jurisdictions but that is different than someone driven by sexual urges to "touch or rub against a nonconsenting person."

A person court ordered to sex offender treatment for the crime of groping up a kilt would be laughed out of group and no doubt refused to be accepted by the agency charged with treating sex offenders.

Best stick with the legal assault than go with the psychiatric deviancy of Frotteurism.