X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.
|
-
9th January 10, 06:43 AM
#5
 Originally Posted by HarborSpringsPiper
...then just adding more material with deeper pleats for the look.
All of the Scottish Highland regimental kilts were pleated to the line, so that adding yardage increased the number of pleats and made the visible portion of each pleat narrower, but didn't appreciably increase the depth of the pleats.
On pleated-to-the-line kilts what would make for deeper pleats would be to use a larger sett size, and in fact this happened too: Napoleonic kilts had a rather small sett size, but by the mid 19th century the sett sizes had got quite huge.
I did read Matt's article and other things which document that kilts originally had less yardage. But they don't address WHY the Army kept increasing the yardage as the 19th century wore on. That's what I wonder: whatever purpose was served by having more and more yardage hanging on your backside, making the kilts less and less balanced?
-
Similar Threads
-
By kevinkinney in forum DIY Showroom
Replies: 7
Last Post: 16th June 07, 10:42 AM
-
By Kilted-Marine in forum DIY Showroom
Replies: 0
Last Post: 6th June 07, 06:04 PM
-
By Shay in forum Miscellaneous Forum
Replies: 23
Last Post: 7th January 07, 07:40 PM
-
By Bob C in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 18
Last Post: 4th January 07, 11:53 PM
-
By Brasilikilt in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 14
Last Post: 4th September 06, 08:48 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks