|
-
17th October 12, 08:35 PM
#1
Ok, here is my first attempt at incorporating some of the very helpful comments that you guys have been kind enough to give...

I switched out the plain white shirt with a patterned one, the plain wool tie with a striped one (admittedly the knot sucks, I'm really going to have to work on that four-in-hand), the "chunky" shoes were swapped out for a pair of thinner soled dress shoes and I pulled the kilt hose down a bit (hopefully not too far). I'm going to order a pair of self-tie garters, because after looking into them a bit more, they really do look cool. I had decided on using sporran hangers as I would be considered a "gentleman of substance" (love that term by the way), but am also looking into a sporran belt as well.
-
-
18th October 12, 03:27 AM
#2
Good job, Army, you've upped your trad kilt game already!
- Justitia et fortitudo invincibilia sunt
- An t'arm breac dearg
-
-
18th October 12, 05:17 AM
#3
That's much better!
I am afraid that I just can't handle those "sporran hangers", but to each their own. Some people do like them, but I don't.
Well done.
As an afterthought it might be interesting to try that outfit with a contrasting colour of hose (red, yellow or mustard perhaps).
Last edited by BCAC; 18th October 12 at 05:19 AM.
-
-
18th October 12, 05:53 AM
#4
I switched out the plain white shirt with a patterned one, the plain wool tie with a striped one (admittedly the knot sucks, I'm really going to have to work on that four-in-hand), the "chunky" shoes were swapped out for a pair of thinner soled dress shoes and I pulled the kilt hose down a bit (hopefully not too far).
Well done on all counts! The patterned shirt and striped tie add a nice effect, don't you think? Now if you can just find a patterned shirt that doesn't have a button-down collar, it will be darn near perfect. I wouldn't worry too much about the tie knot being imperfect. That's how a Four-in-Hand looks: crooked. To me, the hose height looks great; I wouldn't go any lower than that. And I like the shoe choice. All in all, I think everything you've changed is an improvement, especially when it comes to proportions.
I'm with BCAC on the sporran hangers, though. However, I'm not a "man of substance" (which I fear makes me an "insubstantial man" or a "man who lacks substance" ), and I can understand why you might choose them over a traditional sporran belt.
-
-
18th October 12, 06:13 AM
#5
Leather sporran belt for me too,apart from that ,you look a lifer>Jacket is superb by the way
-
-
18th October 12, 12:57 PM
#6
As an afterthought it might be interesting to try that outfit with a contrasting colour of hose (red, yellow or mustard perhaps).
I'm having a hard time picturing that. Would something like this look alright? http://giftshop.scottishtartans.org/...re_mustard.jpg
The patterned shirt and striped tie add a nice effect, don't you think?
They really do. Thanks again for all of the suggestions.
-
-
18th October 12, 01:25 PM
#7
Well done Army you are really doing well, but let's learn to walk before starting on the sprint! The hose that you have in mind are fine and they almost match the sofa!
Might I suggest you start with a plain colour hose from top to bottom, so as not to confuse your novice eyes and brain.How about starting with a dark claret colour, nothing bright, nothing too flashy, but a distinct contrast. I think you will surprise yourself! Go on give it a go. Failing that, dark bottle green will give a rather less adventurous contrast for you to try.
My tartan is much like yours and claret is one of my favorite colours for kilt hose and maybe if you look around some of my old threads you may get an idea from some of the pictures that you will not be struck down by lightening should you try to be a tadd more adventurous.
Last edited by Jock Scot; 18th October 12 at 01:28 PM.
" Rules are for the guidance of wise men and the adherence of idle minds and minor tyrants". Field Marshal Lord Slim.
-
-
18th October 12, 02:20 PM
#8
Thanks Jock Scot... but make no mistake, my novice eyes and brain are already confused. This not being to "matchy" but also looking well put together is not an easy concept for my North American sensibilities. I am very glad to have all the help figuring it out though.
Last edited by Army; 19th October 12 at 11:56 AM.
Reason: spelling
-
-
18th October 12, 02:48 PM
#9
I came accross this picture that might help you decide which way to go. I not saying this is going to suit you just because I say so! I am just demonstrating an option for you to think about.
" Rules are for the guidance of wise men and the adherence of idle minds and minor tyrants". Field Marshal Lord Slim.
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks