X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.

   X Marks Partners - (Go to the Partners Dedicated Forums )
USA Kilts website Celtic Croft website Celtic Corner website Houston Kiltmakers

User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 26

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    18th October 09
    Location
    Orange County California
    Posts
    11,412
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    What would make a "fly plaid" in a different tartan from the kilt look odd is that the very purpose was to simulate the appearance of the "great kilt" or "belted plaid"; here's the original garment all in one piece



    and when they seperated the kilt into the "little kilt" the army devised a garment called the "belted plaid", worn in Full Dress, to simulate the old great kilt. These "belted plaids" as they have always been called are a rather heavy, complex, and expensive garment, made of three seperate pieces of tartan, and fringed all round with rolled fringe



    The modern "fly plaid" is simply a square of tartan with plain fringe and is, more or less, a cheap copy of the traditional "belted plaid".

    Anyhow it is seen sometimes, the wearing of full plaids/long plaid in a contrasting tartan, because the long plaid isn't simulating anything. Look close (not at the DM, at the pipers)


    and one often sees the odd plaids or semi-cloaks or whatever in USA "Irish" pipe bands of a different fabric than the kilt, but of course these costumes are a c1900 creation

    Last edited by OC Richard; 13th December 12 at 06:25 AM.
    Proud Mountaineer from the Highlands of West Virginia; son of the Revolution and Civil War; first Europeans on the Guyandotte

  2. #2
    Join Date
    7th December 12
    Location
    western North Carolina
    Posts
    219
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I just finished reading an interesting bit of Scottish and tartan history. It seems that before the Elizabethan Period, kilts and fly plaids were mixed with no particular attempt at matching (great kilts excepted, of course). Early portraits reportedly show Highlanders wearing whatever colors came to hand. In the Battle of Culloden, units were recognized by the bit of plant material (Bog Laurel for one) stuck in their bonnets, not by the plaid they wore.

    Based on this (and they may be wrong), there is no really "proper" highland kilt attire, except the basics of formal, or semi-formal convention. Prince Charles wears black shoes with a brown sporran and belt, so is it really "proper" that everything match, or be of complementary colors?

    Having said that, I agree that matching and complementary colors present the best appearance overall, but if one is comfortable with what he has on, shouldn't that be the primary criteria?

    The following website was what I read.

    http://www.scottish-wedding-dreams.com/tartans.htm

  3. #3
    Join Date
    17th January 09
    Location
    The Highlands of Norfolk, England
    Posts
    7,015
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by BBNC View Post
    (and they may be wrong),
    I won't speak for the rest, but their ideas about heraldry are very strange, to say the least.

    Regards

    Chas

  4. #4
    Join Date
    7th July 09
    Location
    Melbourne,Victoria Australia
    Posts
    3,439
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Queen Elizabeth I's reign was 1558–1603 (The Elizabethan period) and as such belted plaids were the only highland kilt (1594 was the first documented mention of the belted plaid) There were no fly plaids as we know them today, there was no little kilt. I can't imagine that there were formal and day belted plaids at that time. I really don't think that the website you refer to, has too much in the way of documented facts, more romanticised wishing than anything
    Shoot straight you bastards. Don't make a mess of it. Harry (Breaker) Harbord Morant - Bushveldt Carbineers

  5. #5
    Join Date
    4th November 06
    Location
    Vancouver BC
    Posts
    255
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    George M. Stephen.jpg

    Here is an example of a plaid of a different tartan being worn with a kilt. I believe both are Gordon tartans, but they do appear to be different. The uniform could possibly be connected with the Forfar Militia, circa 1886.
    EPITAPH: Decades from now, no one will know what my bank balance looked like, it won't matter to anyone what kind of car I drove, nor will anyone care what sort of house I lived in. But the world will be a different place, because I did something so mind bafflingly eccentric that my ruins have become a tourist attraction.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    15th August 12
    Location
    Tennessee, USA
    Posts
    3,316
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Gryphon noir View Post
    George M. Stephen.jpg

    Here is an example of a plaid of a different tartan being worn with a kilt. I believe both are Gordon tartans, but they do appear to be different. The uniform could possibly be connected with the Forfar Militia, circa 1886.
    Actually, they are the same tartan. Look again. See the double lines on the fly plaid? They correspond with the kilt.
    This photo is very old and photos from that period are often difficult subjects for the purpose at hand. Easily mistaken, though.

    I second David's opinion regarding fly plaids and also about "matchy-matchy." He is one of the beacons of AHCD (American Highland Civilian Dress).
    The Official [BREN]

  7. #7
    Join Date
    15th August 12
    Location
    Tennessee, USA
    Posts
    3,316
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Accidental double posting.
    Last edited by TheOfficialBren; 7th January 13 at 08:35 PM.
    The Official [BREN]

  8. #8
    Join Date
    18th October 09
    Location
    Orange County California
    Posts
    11,412
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    True indeed that that writer seems to be mixing up what we would call a "Laird's Plaid" and a "Piper's Plaid".

    The Laird's Plaid is a length of tartan folded and placed on one shoulder. A modern Piper's Plaid (called a "long plaid" in the old days) is pleated, with the pleats sewn in, and worn tightly wrapped around the body.

    This distinction though is a modern one; piper's plaids in the old days weren't formally pleated but merely bunched around the body



    and what's more it can be seen in The Highlanders of Scotland that at that time there wasn't a distinction between the Laird's and piper's plaid... many of the men are wearing something in between, a length of tartan loosely draped around the body

    Proud Mountaineer from the Highlands of West Virginia; son of the Revolution and Civil War; first Europeans on the Guyandotte

  9. #9
    Join Date
    18th October 09
    Location
    Orange County California
    Posts
    11,412
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by BBNC View Post
    I just finished reading an interesting bit of Scottish and tartan history. It seems that before the Elizabethan Period, kilts and fly plaids were mixed with no particular attempt at matching (great kilts excepted, of course). Early portraits reportedly show Highlanders wearing whatever colors came to hand. In the Battle of Culloden...
    Let's hold on a minute... you're mixing up various time periods, seperated by hundreds of years.

    If by "Elizabethan period" you mean c1600, there was no such thing as a "fly plaid" and in fact we don't have any portraits or clear depictions of how Highlanders dressed at that time; we do have a woodcut from 1641 showing the various ways the Great Kilt or Belted Plaid was worn.

    The Great Kilt wasn't seperated into two seperate garments until sometime during the 18th century; experts have gone back and forth, but in any case by 1800 the Highland regiments were wearing Little Kilts and "belted plaids" to simulate the look of the old Great Kilt.

    I must emphasize that the "belted plaid" was a nonfunctional thing the sole purpose of which was to simulate the appearance of the old Great Kilt, therefore it was always in the same tartan as the kilt. On the other hand the long plaid, wrapped around the body, was a seperate garment and was often of a different tartan.

    In any case, if you're seriously interested in the history of Highland Dress, that wedding planning site is of no use.

    Rather you should read books on the subject which contain genuine research and give all their sources. My go-to books are

    Old Irish & Highland Dress by HF McClintock (for traditional Irish dress, and it's the best overview of the original sources for early Highland Dress)

    The Uniforms & History of the Scottish Regiments by Major R Money Barnes (great information about the evolution of Scottish military dress)
    Last edited by OC Richard; 16th December 12 at 08:01 AM.
    Proud Mountaineer from the Highlands of West Virginia; son of the Revolution and Civil War; first Europeans on the Guyandotte

  10. #10
    Join Date
    20th January 12
    Location
    The Northern Appalachian Highlands of Southern Ohio
    Posts
    1,632
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    "This guy" has some problems of inaccuracy. The plaid "simply folded and... ...worn hanging straight down over either shoulder" is a day plaid, sometimes called a laird's plaid, but most definitely not a piper's plaid, which by the way is usually pleated -- not folded.
    It should be no surprise that he also advocates the practice of wearing different tartans together -- just one additional faux pas.

    On one very unique occasion, I wore a plaid of a different tartan from my kilt. The kilt was my clan tartan and the plaid was actually a scarf of my mother's, in her clan tartan. The occasion was her funeral. The point here is that if you do choose to wear two different tartans together, it should be for a very important and meaningful reason. People who know proper THCD will wonder at best, and think you ignorant and/or foolish at worst, even if they do not ask.

    THCD is very conservative by American standards, and is decidedly not about the bling, or how much costume you can hang on your body at one time. Whatever you do with it, do it with as much class as you can muster, with respect for a very proud and worthy tradition, or kindly don't do it at all.
    Last edited by David Thorpe; 6th January 13 at 03:04 PM. Reason: Addition of a mea culpa

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0