-
24th December 12, 08:27 AM
#1
Context may have an influence on which clans were named, what was the act about?
" Our sovereign lord and his three estates convened in this present parliament, considering the wicked inclination of the disordered subjects, inhabitants in some parts of the borders adjacent to England and in the highlands and isles, delighting in all mischiefs and most unnaturally and cruelly wasting, slaying, harrying and destroying their own neighbours and native country people, taking occasion of the least trouble that may occur in the inner parts of the realm when they think that care and thought of the repressing of their insolence is in any way forgotten, to renew their most barbarous cruelties and godless oppressions"
Looks like a bad boys club... wasnt that everyone in Scotland other than Campbell of Argyll... ? 
A lot of the other clans are covered under the named individuals... [James Lamont], laird of Lamont, [Lauchlan] MacLean of Duart, etc
Would the Macphersons be covered under Clan Chattan?
Last edited by madmacs; 24th December 12 at 08:49 AM.
-
-
24th December 12, 09:27 AM
#2
Mackeans, Ranalds and Ians comprised what is now called the Clan Donald; Macphersons and Farquharsons are Clan Chattan, as are Glenshee MacThomases and the Atholl Mackintoshes (MacRitchies) although named separately in this list. Forbes was one of those who prepared the list. MacTavish was a Campbell dependant.
Last edited by ThistleDown; 24th December 12 at 10:01 AM.
-
-
24th December 12, 11:49 AM
#3
Interesting that the only Scott's mentioned were the Scotts of Ewesdale. At the time, the Scott's (of Buccleuch) were one of the more powerful clans in the Middle March. The list has their neighbors/rivals, the Armstrongs, Elliots, Nicksons (Nixons), and Crosiers.
John
-
-
24th December 12, 12:07 PM
#4
Remember that this is a list of clans and individuals at odds with the Parliament of the day. Buccleuch was not one of those. Most of the powerful Lowland families are not included simply because they were listing the ones that caused them personal problems as though they were national ones.
-
-
24th December 12, 12:09 PM
#5
Looks like most of the Lothian clans are missing too. I think Madmacs has it right. This is not a list of clans, but a list of clans that someone didn't like. The Earl Marishal of Scotland was a Keith, so obviously the Keiths are missing from this list.
B.D. Marshall
Texas Convener for Clan Keith
-
-
24th December 12, 12:52 PM
#6
Clan Farquharson which was part of the Chattan Confederation, did not become a Clan of any note until the early 1600s. Donald(1st) of Castleton and Tillygarmond was the first to be called Chief of Clan Farquharson by the Privy Council in 1599.
-
-
24th December 12, 01:59 PM
#7
for the full text ( for those looking for names missing from OP) :
http://www.electricscotland.com/webc...y_register.htm
waulk softly and carry a big schtick
-
-
24th December 12, 04:12 PM
#8
Does this list mean that Clan Shaw was staying out of trouble or were we covered under the umbrella of Chattan?
The Official [BREN]
-
-
24th December 12, 04:39 PM
#9
Ahhh... that 'splains it then. Bucclech simply hadn't upset the right (or wrong) people at the time! 
Thanks Rex!
John
-
-
24th December 12, 04:53 PM
#10
Since Shaw is from Macintosh and Farquharson is from Shaw, and they all lived adjacent to each other and next to the Grants, I would say they were implicated also. Plus the fact of being part of the Chattan Confederation along with Davidson, MacBean, MacGillivray, MacIntyre of Badenoch, MacLean of Dochgarroch, MacPhail, MacQueen, MacThomas, and the others already mentioned.
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks