X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.
|
-
22nd March 13, 09:05 AM
#1
Rule 11 is not subjective at all. It is quite specific.
If the discussion had been about the kilt or an kilt outfit there would not have been a problem.
That was not the case in the two instances cites. That's right, this was not an isolated case. It is implied that this was a first offense, It was not.
If you care to look back at post 395, you can plainly see that the purposeful intent was the weapon itself totally separate from anything else.
We really do try to allow threads to stay on their original topic. This one has now gone in a totally different direction.
If anyone would like to discuss Rule 11 or suggest a possible change to that rule may I ask that you start a new thread.
As the OP of this thread has left the forum I think it best to close this thread to preserve the fine discussion on historical garb that it was.
Last edited by Steve Ashton; 22nd March 13 at 09:11 AM.
-
Similar Threads
-
By Woodsheal in forum Highland Games and Celtic Event Discussion
Replies: 11
Last Post: 14th May 09, 07:55 AM
-
By Hamish in forum Contemporary Kilt Wear
Replies: 27
Last Post: 24th February 09, 07:27 PM
-
By Woodsheal in forum Highland Games and Celtic Event Discussion
Replies: 3
Last Post: 22nd August 08, 07:04 PM
-
By S.G. in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 17
Last Post: 30th July 08, 03:21 PM
-
By Robinhood in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 63
Last Post: 3rd March 07, 10:04 PM
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks