interesting Victorian hose

[Nathan]

Well, that's certainly true Nathan. However, I tend to think a "normal" turnover can be rather subjective, as we have seen from time to time that some kilt hose have just enough turnover to cover the width of the garters (diced regimental hose for instance) and maybe a bit more, whilst others have a 3-4 inch turnover. To my eye, the latter looks much more aesthetically pleasing and is arguably what "we" consider to be the standard for most kilt hose, especially for Argyll style tartan hose.

Perhaps the chap's hose did shrink somehow?!

For some reason my "Ayes" aren't working, so....'Aye'.

The Following User Says 'Aye' to creagdhubh For This Useful Post:

Nathan