Quote Originally Posted by Graham
I think the word "discrimination" is a word that is over-used these days, but certainly inappropriate to use here.

Those commenting here are simply expressing an opinion or preference. In some cases, maybe even most, they are based on accepted (by us) standards concerning kilt length.

If you want to do a Madonna thing and wear a kilt too long, or even wear it too short and look like a lassie in a mini-kilt - that's your thing.

It has been simply stated that the "correct" length is between mid and upper knee. Those that enjoy the tradition of the kilt will like to observe that rule.

BTW, well put Blu, as aways.
I think the word "discrimination" is the correct word to use here. However, I think people use it incorrectly. Discrimination simply means to evaluate differences or make a distinction. That's a part of being human. All things are not alike and, as thinking beings, we point out differences.

It's when you start saying this or that is "wrong" where we get into murky waters. It's perfectly fine to state that I prefer X orver Y.

Personally, I think the kilts to the ankles or mid-calf level are nothing more than an exaggeration of traditional style. Similar to the outrageous lapels of the 1960's and 1970's. Are they still kilts? I'd say so. But you wouldn't wear them in a traditional manner.

The differences in fabric are another matter all together. It's the march of progress and technology. I'd wager that our forefathers would have opted for stain-resistent or more durable fabrics if they were available at their time.