-
11th September 14, 10:18 AM
#1
 Originally Posted by Dughlas mor
That is a good looking sword, and the price looks pretty reasonable. Fit and finish look good, and the weight and dimensions look about right. What do you think of the quality of the blade?
It is a backsword, of course. The quality of the blade appears to be on par with most MR blades I have had the chance to examine. There are ripples in the finish which is expected on a blade at this price point but no more than usual. The balance point is 4.5 inches from the guard, the blade is 1.75 inches wide at the hilt tapering down to .75 inches at the point. The sword is quite lively in the hand, being narrow and at 33 inches swings well. I just wish they would make the baskets smaller. They are way too large, even for a sword from the mid-18th c. when baskets tended to be a little larger than the pre-Culloden era swords. The difference in size is painfully obvious in the photo I included of the 1735 era sword compared to the POS hilt. Harvey Withers' book illustrates one of these swords with back and side views. The side view looks very much like the MR replica but when you look at the back view the width of the original is much narrower. Oh well, there are always custom makers out there.
-
-
11th September 14, 10:51 AM
#2
Well, it looks like other than the size of the basket it is a very nice sword at a pretty good price. MR and Windlass seem to be putting out some consistently good products at good prices these days. Thanks for your informative response, and enjoy your new sword!
-
-
11th September 14, 12:29 PM
#3
That almost makes me wish I reenacted that period. Just a note on the basket: MRL tends to make slight modifications to some of their designs based on the needs of the reenactment community. Many of the reenactment groups out there require the wearing of heavily padded gloves. That makes fitting the hand in a regularly sized basket a bit troublesome. I actually had a bit of a problem fitting my fighting gloves into the basket on my later period sword. Just a thought.
Keep your rings charged, pleats in the back, and stay geeky!
https://kiltedlantern.wixsite.com/kiltedlantern
-
-
11th September 14, 04:53 PM
#4
That could be the case but I do not think they are making the swords with reenactors in mind.
-
-
11th September 14, 04:56 PM
#5
Some time back it was this good fortune (?) to purchase a French 1800 pattern Light Cavaly Sabre with "lite" documentary provenance of coming from a Belgian barn in the vicinity of Waterloo.
Comparing with the basket-hilt sword above, the Frenchie's "basket" is only composed of several steel bands from guard to pommel. It is this understanding, most cavalry wore heavy gloves with gauntlets after the time in history when arm-armour was "forsaken."
What the French sabre is though, some traits shared, some not, with the basket-hilt: not elegant, not outrageously well-balanced...
...but a fearsome weapon.
-
-
25th December 14, 01:05 PM
#6
-
The Following 5 Users say 'Aye' to NZ Marty For This Useful Post:
-
25th December 14, 02:54 PM
#7
 Originally Posted by NZ Marty
Now THAT is a proper basket hilted broadsword. I'll bet it is remarkably light and flexible compared to the modern attempts at a replica too. All originals that I have handled and owned certainly were.
Last edited by Mike S; 25th December 14 at 02:56 PM.
My Clans: Guthrie, Sinclair, Sutherland, MacRae, McCain-Maclachlan, MacGregor-Petrie, Johnstone, Hamilton, Boyd, MacDonald-Alexander, Patterson, Thompson. Welsh:Edwards, Williams, Jones. Paternal line: Brandenburg/Prussia.
Proud member: SCV/Mech Cav, MOSB.
-
The Following 2 Users say 'Aye' to Mike S For This Useful Post:
-
25th December 14, 03:25 PM
#8
Very nice indeed. It looks to be in pretty good condition. Thanks for the pics!
-
-
3rd January 15, 08:49 PM
#9
 Originally Posted by Mike S
Now THAT is a proper basket hilted broadsword. I'll bet it is remarkably light and flexible compared to the modern attempts at a replica too. All originals that I have handled and owned certainly were.
The three Armour Class replicas I have are shockingly light in the blade. They handle a lot more like a fencing saber than the iron bars foisted off on buyers as low-end swords.
-
The Following User Says 'Aye' to Mike M. For This Useful Post:
-
25th December 14, 03:39 PM
#10
Congrats on the sword it looks great. But that original is just awesome. Thanks for sharing guys!
Regards David
-
The Following User Says 'Aye' to David Dubh For This Useful Post:
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks