|
-
13th March 16, 12:52 PM
#1
I watch with my wife. She has read all the books. We actually look foward to it. I realize that the story is fictional but i do not think that gives them the right to take so many liberties with historical accuracy. We watch for entertainment value not history lesson. It has caused us to research things we might not have otherwise.
-
-
13th March 16, 03:10 PM
#2
 Originally Posted by kiltedcontractor
I watch with my wife. She has read all the books. We actually look foward to it. I realize that the story is fictional but i do not think that gives them the right to take so many liberties with historical accuracy. We watch for entertainment value not history lesson. It has caused us to research things we might not have otherwise.
What historical inaccuracies have you noted?
Slàinte mhath!
Freep is not a slave to fashion.
Aut pax, aut bellum.
-
-
13th March 16, 03:24 PM
#3
I've a history degree and have come to find that there are movies, tv shows and books in the historical fiction genre that cover the spectrum from abysmal (Braveheart, Reign, Breakheart Pass) to so-so (The Patriot, Dances With Wolves) to pretty decent (IMO Outlander, Vikings and others). If you demand outright exact accuracy from any sort of fiction you're doomed to disappointment. For that matter such disappointment will follow you into the full-on study of history. The amount of inaccuracy of even original sources is stunning.
So, in order to be able to watch and read historical fiction I find a policy of noting the minor foibles in storytelling, promising myself to write the producers a stern note (which I never actually do) and enjoying the rest of the movie, tv show or book to be most useful. I would also point out that I've learned a lot about things and events outside of my specialty as a result of researching some little detail that didn't seem quite right. Sometimes I've even been surprised t find such details were actually correct.
Last edited by freep; 13th March 16 at 03:26 PM.
Slàinte mhath!
Freep is not a slave to fashion.
Aut pax, aut bellum.
-
The Following User Says 'Aye' to freep For This Useful Post:
-
 Originally Posted by freep
I've a history degree and have come to find that there are movies, tv shows and books in the historical fiction genre that cover the spectrum from abysmal (Braveheart, Reign, Breakheart Pass) to so-so (The Patriot, Dances With Wolves) to pretty decent (IMO Outlander, Vikings and others). If you demand outright exact accuracy from any sort of fiction you're doomed to disappointment. For that matter such disappointment will follow you into the full-on study of history. The amount of inaccuracy of even original sources is stunning.
So, in order to be able to watch and read historical fiction I find a policy of noting the minor foibles in storytelling, promising myself to write the producers a stern note (which I never actually do) and enjoying the rest of the movie, tv show or book to be most useful. I would also point out that I've learned a lot about things and events outside of my specialty as a result of researching some little detail that didn't seem quite right. Sometimes I've even been surprised t find such details were actually correct.
The Material culture is atrocious. Plaid brooches, comicon sword baldrics, obvious machine sewn button holes. It's horrid
I read the books, have not seen anything other than stills as I don't have a functioning TV and neither of my streaming services has the show.
-
-
 Originally Posted by Luke MacGillie
The Material culture is atrocious. Plaid brooches, comicon sword baldrics, obvious machine sewn button holes. It's horrid
I read the books, have not seen anything other than stills as I don't have a functioning TV and neither of my streaming services has the show.
More's the pity.
Slàinte mhath!
Freep is not a slave to fashion.
Aut pax, aut bellum.
-
-
OK so I finally bit the bullet and purchased a subscription to the show.
Im actually pretty happy with the storytelling and cinematography.
They should hire me to be a tech advisor so that folks baldric buckles get properly buckled, and frizzens closed when holding a pistol on someone.
I don't get why it took to the middle of the first season for an actual Scottish pistol on a Scot to make an appearance.....
-
The Following 2 Users say 'Aye' to Luke MacGillie For This Useful Post:
-
 Originally Posted by Luke MacGillie
I don't get why it took to the middle of the first season for an actual Scottish pistol on a Scot to make an appearance.....
Recovering weapons on a battlefield (even the enemies) was and is accepted practice. Any pistols (non Scottish) shown before mid-first season, may have been picked up after a skirmish.
It is still visual entertainment, even with an attempt to reproduce history-fiction-romantic ideology-etc.
-
The Following 2 Users say 'Aye' to Tarheel For This Useful Post:
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks