-
7th December 16, 10:23 PM
#1
The hilt of the Cold Steel sword is based on the 1828 regimental pattern, the broad, triple fullered blade is more reminiscent of an earlier 18th century Jacobite era blade, so it`s kind of a mash up. I`d say that the liner it came with is about as good as anything, though the buff leather/ red wool felt ones are very nice.
-
-
8th December 16, 03:57 AM
#2
Here are a few swords that actually have liners. The Cold Squeal swords liner is not anything at all like any original I have looked at. Now if you decide to take it out, you will need patience. Just like the liner is not like anything I have seen, how the hilt and blade are joined together are nothing like I have ever seen, with extra nuts, set screws and the like all holding it together. I do not have a good set of instructions for you, but can only say its almost counter intuitive.
http://www.nms.ac.uk/explore/collect...?item_id=16438
http://www.nms.ac.uk/explore/collect...?item_id=26757
http://www.nms.ac.uk/explore/collect...?item_id=26777
http://www.nms.ac.uk/explore/collect...item_id=237166
-
The Following User Says 'Aye' to Luke MacGillie For This Useful Post:
-
8th December 16, 01:52 PM
#3
Thanks you for the replies.
Luke, you pretty much answered my next question, which was going to be: How to take it out? Perhaps it's best left alone.
Tulach Ard
-
-
9th December 16, 06:40 AM
#4
 Originally Posted by MacKenzie
Thanks you for the replies.
Luke, you pretty much answered my next question, which was going to be: How to take it out? Perhaps it's best left alone.
I would leave it alone. If I remember correctly, the Cold Steel sword has a pommel which screws onto the tang. That makes the basket easier to remove than one which is peened but it is still possible to bugger up the threads on the tang while doing so, which creates some problems. Basket liners are correct for the 1828 pattern sword. Most of the earlier swords were originally equipped with a pad at the front of the basket to protect the hand and a few may have had partial or full liners but this did not become common until the 1828 pattern was introduced.
The Cold Steel sword is pretty well made and does have a nice blade but I agree that it combines a Jacobite era blade with a basket which would have been much later. However, no small number of newer baskets attached to older blades survive in Scotland.
Last edited by MacRob; 9th December 16 at 09:09 AM.
-
The Following 2 Users say 'Aye' to MacRob For This Useful Post:
-
9th December 16, 02:45 PM
#5
 Originally Posted by MacRob
I would leave it alone. If I remember correctly, the Cold Steel sword has a pommel which screws onto the tang. That makes the basket easier to remove than one which is peened but it is still possible to bugger up the threads on the tang while doing so, which creates some problems. Basket liners are correct for the 1828 pattern sword. Most of the earlier swords were originally equipped with a pad at the front of the basket to protect the hand and a few may have had partial or full liners but this did not become common until the 1828 pattern was introduced.
The Cold Steel sword is pretty well made and does have a nice blade but I agree that it combines a Jacobite era blade with a basket which would have been much later. However, no small number of newer baskets attached to older blades survive in Scotland.
The pommel is merely decorative, it comes off, then you have to remove one or two actual nuts that hold handle and blade together, then there are a couple of shims that go between top and bottom of handle and hilt. Its more that what you want to do when you have 10 mins till formation and think taking that horrible polycotton felt liner should take no more than 5 mins.......
MacRob is right about old blades and new baskets, recently handled a very early 18th Cent basket hilt with a 1531 date and a Passau Running Wolf.
The half liner, the ones I have seen have been buff leather, are nice, I need to put one of those in my sword!
Of course finding some good buff leather, not just buff colored leather is always problematic.
-
The Following 3 Users say 'Aye' to Luke MacGillie For This Useful Post:
-
9th December 16, 03:13 PM
#6
I never took one apart in the 14 years I sold swords. So, that is what happens when you assume that one sword is constructed just like another. Good to know that it is easy to disassemble, although I do not have one and probably will not.
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks