X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.
|
-
16th August 18, 12:39 PM
#10
To me, the first picture Tobus posted is perfectly fine. The second one, the lines are a bit too wide for a kilt. I consider a traditional tattersall to be a subtle pattern on a light color base, white or off white or cream. Printed lines just means a lower cost to produce and hence a lower cost to the consumer. A fabric with woven lines will always be more expensive and consider a finer material. In the end, we are at the mercy of marketing departments that label shirts this that or the other. I've seen a huge spectrum of shirts marketed as tattersall, but if I had to draw the line somewhere based on traditional kilted attire, I would say the thinner and subtle pattern lines work best.
Last edited by Manu; 16th August 18 at 12:56 PM.
-
The Following 2 Users say 'Aye' to Manu For This Useful Post:
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks