Quote Originally Posted by James
.... and the subject is just what is meant by a kilt?
Perhaps the kilt has too much meaning. As long as it is worn only because it is a traditional costume, it will remain in the background. The cost is obviously a contributing factor to its infrequent use. If the kilt could be made affordable and retain most of the accepted elements of its heritage, more Scots might choose it as a viable clothing option. And if some of the modern variants sell because they are labelled "kilt" rather than "manskirt", I don't think this shows any disrespect for the traditional Scottish form.

On the other hand, Scots may be perfectly happy with the way things are. Nothing wrong with that. Either way, to deny the modern variant a chance to earn it's rightful place in the world may prove to be detrimental to both forms.

I think it would be wonderful to see the Scots wear their kilts as often as our American bretheren display their national flag. Clearly, for the kilt to be seen more often in Scotland, the Scots will have to reach beyond their own restrictions (misgivings?) regarding the kilt and what it means to wear it.


blu