X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.
|
-
1st July 05, 04:10 AM
#12
 Originally Posted by James
It might be well not to be too adventurous, and look to a traditional kilt, rather than some of the variants.
For it is a garment that can be justified, and accepted.
Here there is a very delicate point, manners. For it is a sad fact that individuals wearing some of the variants, will be treated with good manners, and so be certain that their 'kilt' is accepted. However what is actually being said about them and their choice of attire can be very different: and without doubt their nether wear is not being seen as a kilt.
A very valid point, James. The wearing of the traditional kilt is obviously less "risky" than the modern variants. I should add, however, that the rules of justification and acceptance change over time. Women today wear trousers because they took the bull by the nads and decided collectively to do it. For men, why should the modern variant be any different. Only by wearing it often and with abandon and confidence, will it be accepted without some pretext or justification for doing so. Nothing ventured... Nothing gained.
...there are many who take the kilt-it's making and wearing very seriously indeed.
Very important indeed, for the health and survival of the tradition and all it represents.
...Therefore it will probably be easiest to follow present conventions when first venturing into the kilted world....
I followed this route as did many on this board. I must admit though, I have to give much credit for blatant cheek and audacity to those who venture directly into wearing a modern variant that has no tradition for a buffer.
... Again I regret being contentious, but there is little point in avoiding a problem: which unless addressed will without doubt one day cause some innocent soul great embarrassement. James
The degree of embarrassment felt will be proportional to the degree of importance we place on tradition, personal connection, and justification. It would seem that some people are incapable of knowing when to feel embarrassement. (Look at Sportkilts "Wall of Fame" for example.)
I think J. Carbombs basic rules pretty much nails it home. Until the wearing of kilts becomes much more common place, there will be a degree of blurring to the definition and hence a reason for discussions such as this.
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks