X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.

   X Marks Partners - (Go to the Partners Dedicated Forums )
USA Kilts website Celtic Croft website Celtic Corner website Houston Kiltmakers

User Tag List

Results 1 to 10 of 11

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    23rd January 04
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    2,040
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Before we go through this again, do a "search" through the general section on material weight. You'll find the definitive thread on the subject.
    Arise. Kill. Eat.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    8th February 04
    Location
    3389 Schuylkill Rd, Spring City, PA 19475
    Posts
    5,854
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    It's 1 full yard at the FULL WIDTH OF THE BOLT. most bolts come in 56 to 60 inch widths.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    15th June 05
    Location
    Belcamp, MD
    Posts
    148
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    That makes no sense though... what if for some reason it's woven at a smaller width? Doesnt change the weight of the fabric or how dense or heavy it is. Now I can see "The weight of 1 yard at 60" wide" but "1 yard at the full bolt width" doesnt make any sense.

  4. #4
    M. A. C. Newsome is offline
    INACTIVE

    Contributing Tartan Historian
    Join Date
    26th January 05
    Location
    Western NC
    Posts
    5,714
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    When someone is discussing the weight of kilt cloth (usually 10 oz for light weight, 13 oz for medium weight, 16 oz per heavy weight), they are talking about the weight per linear yard of 54" wide fabric (double width).

    Even if the fabric is single width, the weight will still be given as if the fabric were double width. For instance, 28" wide fabric of heavy kilt cloth will still be called 16 oz, not 8 oz.

    M

  5. #5
    Join Date
    15th June 05
    Location
    Belcamp, MD
    Posts
    148
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Ok, difinitive answer, thanks MAC. 1 yard of 54" wide fabric, weigh it, there is your fabric weight.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    18th February 05
    Location
    Spokane, WA
    Posts
    3,363
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Thanks for the answer

    Mac,
    I'm always glad when you weigh in on subjects. I don't always agree, but I always find a reasoned, historically informed answer.
    Thanks

  7. #7
    Join Date
    8th February 04
    Location
    3389 Schuylkill Rd, Spring City, PA 19475
    Posts
    5,854
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by M. A. C. Newsome
    When someone is discussing the weight of kilt cloth (usually 10 oz for light weight, 13 oz for medium weight, 16 oz per heavy weight), they are talking about the weight per linear yard of 54" wide fabric (double width).

    Even if the fabric is single width, the weight will still be given as if the fabric were double width. For instance, 28" wide fabric of heavy kilt cloth will still be called 16 oz, not 8 oz.

    M
    huh... I had read it was the full width of the bolt, but having a "standard width" makes sense. You learn something everyday.

  8. #8
    M. A. C. Newsome is offline
    INACTIVE

    Contributing Tartan Historian
    Join Date
    26th January 05
    Location
    Western NC
    Posts
    5,714
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    huh... I had read it was the full width of the bolt, but having a "standard width" makes sense. You learn something everyday.
    Well, yes and no....

    For instance, in Lochcarron's old cataloges, before they went to weavign all of their heavy weight cloth in double width, they used to have some tartans available double and some single. Their double width, heavy weight cloth, was listed at 16 oz. Their single width, heavy weight cloth, was listed at 8 oz. But the cloth was the same weight. An in parenthesis, they put some kind of note explaining that 8 oz at 28" is the same as 16 oz at 54".

    Then take Dalgleish -- their catalog lists 28" cloth at 16 oz, but again, they mean 8 oz at 28" wide.

    So, I'd say *technically* weight should be given at the full width of the cloth, but for the sake of clarity, most people assume a 54" width regarless of how wide the cloth actually is.

    Aye,
    Matt

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0