X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.

   X Marks Partners - (Go to the Partners Dedicated Forums )
USA Kilts website Celtic Croft website Celtic Corner website Houston Kiltmakers

User Tag List

Results 1 to 10 of 55

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Dreadbelly is offline Membership Revoked for repeated rule violations.
    Join Date
    15th August 04
    Posts
    2,967
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Very good eye sir.

    That style of blade would gain an extra inch or so and would eventually become that particular modle. The knife in the picture only has a 2 inch blade. The handle, at the time, was pretty impressive stuff. The wetter it gets, the "stickier" it feels. Covered in grease, water, sweat, whatever, makes the grip feel tacky and sticky in your hand. It's rubbery and spongy. My knife was a first generation of a new style.

    The second generation the blades were thinned out just a little bit, extended to 3 inches and 3 3/4th inches depending on the model. The back edge of the knife became straighter. They also slowly phased out the "squared" tip going for something a bit more pointed. Prices dropped considerably with the next few production models. Sort of like when the Leatherman was first introduced, the prices were astronomical, insane, and quickly dropped down to a much more reasonable price. Also, the grips went from being somewhat spongy to being hard as a brick. I am not sure why, I actually liked the soft squeezeable grip. Less stress on the hands during certain jobs. Also, I personally didn't like the change to a more pointed blade. I am not sure why, but I like the squared off tip on the one I have.

    They also made a folder, which I wasn't impressed with at all. I really hate to say it, but it felt... Chintzy. The metal frame that housed the blade, it would press in to your fingers uncomfortably when you sqeezed the rubberised grip. Which was just rubbery. None of the sticky feeling of the earlier generations. The metal frame was also thin, and bent easily if you squeezed to hard.

    I wonder if Mora makes a wee knife.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    6th March 04
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN USA
    Posts
    274
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think any of the slim lockblades with with the pocket clip are well-siuted for sock wear.
    For all but the most formal events, I usually have a Jaguar M4 Balisong knife peeking out of my sock. I plan to get one of the Cold Steel's fiberglass skean dhu knives also.

    I would never throw a knife unless I didn't care if I got it back.

    I don't like to carry expensive knives, the lawmen here tend to confiscate them, or even worse, I lose them.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    21st May 04
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    2,824
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Have a look at these this guy live just up the road from me here in Norway
    http://www.vestfoldnett.com/art/knut-dahl/
    All the Best.....David.
    Why be part of the crowd Choose a Freelander Sporran
    A Member of the Caledonian Society of Norway
    My Photo Gallery Flickr

  4. #4
    Join Date
    27th June 05
    Location
    London, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,808
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Freelander Sporrano
    Have a look at these this guy live just up the road from me here in Norway
    http://www.vestfoldnett.com/art/knut-dahl/
    very interesting road you live on.
    What kind of price range are these?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    21st May 04
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    2,824
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    About 800 to 1000US . Sten Rune (My partner in Sporrans) Says the dragon in 1995 was around the 800 dollar mark .

    I'll e-mail the chap and ask him. Every thing is hand made from blade to sheeth
    All the Best.....David.
    Why be part of the crowd Choose a Freelander Sporran
    A Member of the Caledonian Society of Norway
    My Photo Gallery Flickr

  6. #6
    Join Date
    5th September 05
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    5,144
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ...just a dumb newbie question (two questions, actually):

    ...could someone please give me a phonetic pronunciation of sgain dubh so that I don't make an *** of myself if the topic comes up in conversation...

    ...and would the plural be "sgains dubh" or "sgain dubhs"?

    I had a buddy who was very up on Gaelic languages and I once pinned him down on why some of the words are pronounced so differently from their spelling even when they are "anglicized" for consumption by the unenlightened...he had no good answer for the question...go figure.

    best

    argonian

  7. #7
    Dreadbelly is offline Membership Revoked for repeated rule violations.
    Join Date
    15th August 04
    Posts
    2,967
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Skeen DOO.

    DOO should rhyme with NOO! Which can only be properly said with a Scottish burr.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    27th June 05
    Location
    London, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,808
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by auld argonian
    ...just a dumb newbie question (two questions, actually):

    ...could someone please give me a phonetic pronunciation of sgain dubh so that I don't make an *** of myself if the topic comes up in conversation...

    ...and would the plural be "sgains dubh" or "sgain dubhs"?

    I had a buddy who was very up on Gaelic languages and I once pinned him down on why some of the words are pronounced so differently from their spelling even when they are "anglicized" for consumption by the unenlightened...he had no good answer for the question...go figure.

    best

    argonian
    Dread's close enough, there's sort of a skip in the first word "ski" then "yen" or "yan", the NOO sound sort of goes nasal on the first O and slides to normal. The k sound is not too sharp that's why you sometimes see the hard "g" sound. It's in between there. The "y" is barely there. That's why it's a different language and varied spelling for the English. There's a lot of lilts, pauses, and emphasis. All of which vary from area to area. The basic rule is to say it very fast and try and make it all one word.

    Plural, most would accept skean dhus, Scottish Gaelic plural is usually an "ach" suffix. I'm not sure what the absolute grammar rule would be. Try, "Please give me a skean dhu, and while you're at it, give me two more." (I know, I stole that from some president, I think.)

  9. #9
    An t-Ileach's Avatar
    An t-Ileach is offline Oops, it seems this member needs to update their email address
    Join Date
    28th June 05
    Location
    Preas a'Chiobair/Shepherd's Bush, Lunnainn/London RA/UK
    Posts
    468
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by auld argonian
    ...just a dumb newbie question (two questions, actually):

    ...could someone please give me a phonetic pronunciation of sgain dubh so that I don't make an *** of myself if the topic comes up in conversation...

    ...and would the plural be "sgains dubh" or "sgain dubhs"?

    I had a buddy who was very up on Gaelic languages and I once pinned him down on why some of the words are pronounced so differently from their spelling even when they are "anglicized" for consumption by the unenlightened...he had no good answer for the question...go figure.

    best

    argonian
    Argonian,

    We're talking anglicisms here, really. So Archangel's phonetics are as close as any. I'd plump for "sgian dubhs" in the plural.

    Gaelic does have a system about its orthography, it's just not an English system, which is why it often seems incomprehensible. And why the way a word sounds seems nothing like the way it's written - such as "man from Skye" sounds like 'skee un okh' but is written sgitheanach or sgiathanach: or a "man from Islay" sounds like "un chee lyokh" but is written an t-Ìleach.

    Actually, strictly speaking and a matter of interest, the "black" part should be written dhubh (and pronounced with a sort of gentle gargling sound 'ghoo') as sgian is a feminine noun, and the plural in Gaelic would be sgèine-dhubh ("skay nyu ghoo").

    But in our everyday lives we are dealing with a loan-word into English, so sgian-dubh and sgian-dubhs, in my opinion, works fine. It's like two other loan-words from Gaelic: "galore" and "smashing" (I don't know whether you have this in American English, it means "really good" or something) - we wouldn't expect to see them written as gu leor or 's math sin, although they sound very much like they do in English.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0