X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.
|
-
22nd September 05, 06:46 PM
#8
 Originally Posted by KiltedCodeWarrior
OK, in a series of postings with KiltedPride, he advanced the idea that UK, FK, USAK, etc. were not real kilts and should be referred to in some other way.
In replying, please try to keep posts up to the level of sophistication and courteous-ness (is that a word?) that is being shown on a number of other threads that deal with issues that we might have strong, and differing, opinions about.
RJI
Said as nicely as possible, perhaps then, these people should be referred to in some other way?
I tend toward bubba's line of thought...if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck and sheds water like a duck then its a duck. Personally I don't care what you call a kilt but to call it something it isn't is only showing ignorance.
Mike
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks