Quote Originally Posted by lrpddrummie
You have become blinded by your opinion and completely missed my point. You said you see no point in arguing with people who do not how to argue but yet you offered no counter argument to my point.
Why not? Here it comes:

Quote Originally Posted by lrpddrummie
... I am arguing that if you are going to look at a circus clown in kilt as having a potentially negative impact on the kilted community then you need to look at all the negative sources i.e. the portrayal of Duncan and Willie as buffoons.
That's like saying that if you drink a glass, then you have to drink an ocean. Your point is nonsense. That's why I didn't respond to it. That's why I wouldn't have responded to it if you hadn't cried fowl.

Oh, well. As long as your straw man is up there, I'll expedite it with a quick whack.

I haven't seen much of MotG, but from what I gather, Duncan is not a clown in any sense of the word. Being hapless doesn't make you a clown. Being comic relief doesn't make you a clown. If you see Duncan and a circus clown as equivalents, you are being willfully and pitifully obtuse.

And "obtuse" is what I think of your side's position. You are still doing nothing to shake my argument. I'll restate it so that you may take it on, and not some cartoonish interpretation of it:

"I see no reason to go to Ringling Bros. circus to promote kilt-wearing."

That's the position. Grab a stick and get busy.