What would you rather have?

**ccga3359** · 5th February 07, 01:37 PM

Have boots, need kilts.

**Eujeankilt** · 5th February 07, 02:25 PM

Originally Posted by ccga3359

Have boots, need kilts.

I don't need more boots, but I can always use kilts. Personally, I would go for the leather kilt.

Dale

**Hamish** · 6th February 07, 04:41 PM

Originally Posted by McMurdo

I am realistic enough to know that I am not Vin Diesel.

Nor am I !!! However, I have enough boots but can never have too many kilts, so I'd opt for the leather kilt - which would be my seventh in genuine leather (Oooops! Sorry eighth as Robert at R-Kilts is making me another!).

Go for it, Raph. You know you want it!

**Nick** · 6th February 07, 04:46 PM

That's an easy one for me: kilt and boots. I doubt I'll ever buy a leather kilt, just not fond of 'em. But I'd love some nice new hiking boots! The soles are coming off the uppers on mine and I can't afford new boots.

**GMan** · 6th February 07, 07:25 PM

The idea of a leather Kilt has always appealed to me especially since I became a consistent Kilt wearer. Yet I like you am very aware of cost (that's what I do)

Go for the boots and Kilt now and then save up for the leather.

**Dirka Skene** · 5th February 07, 01:38 PM

They're still cool, he just made them cooler.

**IEScotsman** · 5th February 07, 01:38 PM

boots and kilt

**arrogcow** · 5th February 07, 01:47 PM

While I'm not likely to ever get a leather (I'd get another tartan first, any day of the week), I'd pick just the leather over a regular and a pair of New Rocks assuming I had to pick a or b. Now getting 2-5 regular (depending UK or RK) and no boots, I'd just get the kilts.

Adam