What would you rather have?

[ccga3359]

Have boots, need kilts.

[Dirka Skene]

They're still cool, he just made them cooler.

[IEScotsman]

boots and kilt

[arrogcow]

While I'm not likely to ever get a leather (I'd get another tartan first, any day of the week), I'd pick just the leather over a regular and a pair of New Rocks assuming I had to pick a or b. Now getting 2-5 regular (depending UK or RK) and no boots, I'd just get the kilts.

Adam

[Monkey@Arms]

New Rock's don't do it for me, but I've seen some sweet looking leather kilts on these pages . . .

Best regards,

Jake

[Eujeankilt]

Have boots, need kilts.

I don't need more boots, but I can always use kilts. Personally, I would go for the leather kilt.

Dale

[beverlonian]

Have got boots & kilts (wool, denim, poly-viscose, acrylic) - but haven't got a leather one yet - so I'd go for a leather!

[Tattoo Bradley]

Define: "regular kilt."

If you're talking wool, 13-16 oz. and boots. That would be an EASY choice for me.

[Erisianmonkey]

I like leather, but I'm not all that fond of leather kilts. I'd go for the $ value of kilt + boots. Then again, I'm cheap.

[Blu (Ontario)]

Leather kilt - (brown leather)