X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.
-
31st March 07, 02:32 PM
#9
 Originally Posted by arrogcow
And just cause someone else says that you have a connection, doesn't make it so. My mother has been doing our family tree for years, and doesn't believe it unless she has authentic documents in her hand. She has found many errors in other people's reconing. To date my earliest verifiable ancestor is 1664, but some of the fanciful ones get me back to Longshanks (which now gets me kicked off of X-marks)
Adam
It's an unfortunate fact that the further back you go genealogically, the more time you spend sorting out other people's errors rather than doing original resarch, but that's just the way it is.
As to Longshanks, many if not most people now living in Scotland are probably also his descendants. His grandson's, Edward III's, are certainly well into the millions. A genealogical wit once called him "the father of the British middle classes."
-
Similar Threads
-
By Mr. Kilt in forum Kilts in the Media
Replies: 13
Last Post: 31st January 07, 08:04 AM
-
By souzaphone711 in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 29
Last Post: 19th December 06, 01:24 PM
-
By Big Dave in forum Show us your pics
Replies: 13
Last Post: 9th April 06, 11:23 AM
-
By Derek in forum Show us your pics
Replies: 8
Last Post: 27th November 05, 09:04 PM
-
By Canuck in forum Contemporary Kilt Wear
Replies: 11
Last Post: 4th August 04, 03:14 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks