Irish Tartans Questions

[davedove]

One noteable exception is the "Ulster" tartan, which dates from the late 1500s-early 1600s and was discovered by a farmer in the 1950's in the form of a pair of trews which had been buried:

http://www.ulsterscotsagency.com/tartanandkilts.asp

Regards,

Todd

But even though the tartan itself is old, that just means it existed back then. It didn't have any official recognition.

[James MacMillan]

But even though the tartan itself is old, that just means it existed back then. It didn't have any official recognition.

Official recognition is itself a very slippery slope. What is "Official?" For Scottish Clans, it has come to be the Clan Chief's seal of approval. For other odd organizations, like an up-start internet clan , it is general acceptance and use. Business', Club's, Countries, Counties, Cities, Reunions, etc etc all have a right to "Officially" establish a tartan.

Take my beloved Leatherneck tartan, for instance. Through the hard work of Bob Hall, who designed and registered our tartan, the Marines have something that they call their own. Has the Marine Corps sanctioned or made this tartan "Official?" NO. Does that mean that all Marines, past and present are any less proud to wear it? No.

By far the best thing that you can do regarding wearing any tartan, and I mean any, is to make peace with yourself for wearing it. If you feel more comfortable wearing a district tartan, then, by all means do so.

There is also nothing that says you can't design a tartan yourself and place your own name, or the name of your beloved, on it.

and before I forget from Sunny Southern California!

[davedove]

By far the best thing that you can do regarding wearing any tartan, and I mean any, is to make peace with yourself for wearing it. If you feel more comfortable wearing a district tartan, then, by all means do so.

So very true.

There is also nothing that says you can't design a tartan yourself and place your own name, or the name of your beloved, on it.

Just waiting for the cloth to be woven.

[The Wizard of BC]

And to further muddy the waters about Irish Tartans....Each weaving mill is free to weave anything they want and three of them have done what they call the "Official" Irish Tartans. The most notable is Marton Mills which call theirs "Irish Clan Crest Tartans".
Then there are the Irish National, Irish Heritage, etc.
Of course you can always go with Saffron.

[gilmore]

...Of course you can always go with Saffron.

That's what I did. My nephew wears a Stillwater Irish National, also because he goes to Colorado State University, whose home colors are green and yellow, away color is white. He may have started a trend at the football games there. Others have appeared.

[macwilkin]

But even though the tartan itself is old, that just means it existed back then. It didn't have any official recognition.

That wasn't my point, Dave. My point was that the Ulster tartan did not originate in the 19th century, when Irish nationalists began to adopt Highland attire as some sort of "pan-Celtic" garment.

Todd

[gilmore]

That wasn't my point, Dave. My point was that the Ulster tartan did not originate in the 19th century, when Irish nationalists began to adopt Highland attire as some sort of "pan-Celtic" garment.

Todd

The Ulster tartan occurred to me, but I think it could be distinguished from the later Irish tartans as it was most likely worn by Scots (or a Scot) who probably would not have identified themselves as being Irish, but as Scots merely living in Ireland at the time. It is a beautiful tartan IMHO.

[macwilkin]

The Ulster tartan occurred to me, but I think it could be distinguished from the later Irish tartans as it was most likely worn by Scots (or a Scot) who probably would not have identified themselves as being Irish, but as Scots merely living in Ireland at the time. It is a beautiful tartan IMHO.

Good point, gilmore. Some scholars believe it was woven in Ireland, and then sent to the Highlands where it was made into the pair of trews, as per the article on the Ulster-Scots agency. And yes, it's pedigree is certainly more Scottish than Irish, much like the Ulster-Scots themselves.

Cheers,

Todd

[turpin]

If your wife is an American whose family has roots in Virginia, it might be more historically accurate to dress her as a native American of the Powhatan tribe, since many Bowlings are descended from them through Pocahantas (as am I.) Of course, the neighbors are likely to gossip about exposed tattooed bosoms, but that's a small price to pay for historical accuracy.

Gil! And from a monk, no less. You sly devil!

[porrick]

I find the obsession of "recognition" and "official" interesting


I don't need an agency, clan chief or some book to tell me what is "recognized" and "official".

1. I feel superbly comfortable wearing kilts
2. I like or dislike certain tartans
3. the quality of the garment is in the fabric and the kiltmaker
4. the positive attention and interest in the garment I get when wearing it
5. I wear my kilts with pride

Do any of the above points become more or less valid if a kilt has someone's stamp of approval? If someone's approval is of concern, I must be that of the missus.

I'm proud of wearing what has by some been coined "fashion tartans", and often with the hint of "merely" to it. Though not a term I use.
How about these two definitions of "fashion" given in Collins Cobuild:

The fashion in which someone does something or in which something happens is the way in which it happens or is done.

If someone or something fashions you, your attitudes, or your future, they have an influence on you which affects your development.

Are the above two definitions not applicable to tartans that are "recognized"?

I'm waiting for somebody to chime in with the definition of fashion as something in the line of "that change as people's ideas and taste change". Well, I certainly hope that definition doesn't apply to "fashion tartans", as that would knock us all on the head:

the very reason we all are here enjoying eachother's company and common (recent) interest in this delightful garment.

Oh, another point I find interesting: "yes, but the Irish tartans are all of recent date"
True, precisely as the establishment of the present day "official" tartans once were "recently" designed and brand-new on the marked

I thoroughly enjoy history in general, and genealogy especially. But, maybe sometimes the obsession with the so-called historical correct may get in the way of ongoing development. After all, in a one to two hundred year cultural pespective, how can we single out certain tartan designs as being ancient/old/historical? (just a rhetorical question, so answer not required)

OK, just my 2c worth to balance things out and show line of thinking - and have no intention of debating with those of you who find my thoughts and feelings (as) invalid (as yours).

Enjoy proud kilting - tartan or not.

PS
Just thought about one thing:
Cheap, poor quality Pakistani-made officially regognized MacClansept tartan kilts - as opposed to my fashion kilts designed, woven and hand-sewn in Scotland? Hmm, now that's a culturally tough one...