X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.

   X Marks Partners - (Go to the Partners Dedicated Forums )
USA Kilts website Celtic Croft website Celtic Corner website Houston Kiltmakers

User Tag List

Results 1 to 10 of 26

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    5th November 07
    Location
    Vailly-sur Sauldre, FRANCE
    Posts
    4,435
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil View Post
    It was actually James II, defeated by William of Orange at the Battle of the Boyne in 1690. Do you know where the Robertson estates were? Neither Robertson or Reid are uncommon names in Scotland and if you can place your Reid ancestor in the same area then it is a possibility.
    Thank you for the rectification.

    I read somewhere that James the Second of Scotland was also refered to as James VII of England but I must be mixing up a few things here !

    Jean Reid's parents are David Reid and Elizabeth McKinnon . It is said that they were "from" Inverness-shire. But they did move around alot in these troubled times.
    Robert Amyot-MacKinnon

  2. #2
    Phil is offline Membership Revoked for repeated rule violations.
    Join Date
    13th March 07
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    2,407
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The other way around actually, he was James II of England which is how he is usually referred to. I think most Scots, particularly the Covenanters, would prefer not to refer to him at all. Jamie the saxt (James VI of Scotland) son of Mary Queen of Scots became James I of England and on Charles II's death with no heir his brother James got the job. Confusing isn't it? Our present queen should properly be known in Scotland as Elizabeth I but somebody decided that the Scottish people have no history of any value so imposed her on them as Elizabeth II. Quite a lot of Scots don't really have much time for the whole deferential royal thing apart from those around Dee-side who make a nice living out of it. But I digress. Unfortunately Robertson, Reid & McKinnon are fairly common names and widespread throughout Scotland which makes tracking any down all the more difficult. Inverness-shire isn't too far removed from Robertson country and is the centre most folk from the isles such as McKinnons tend to head for so I think you would be safe enough assuming your Reid was one of the Robertson Reids.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    5th November 07
    Location
    Vailly-sur Sauldre, FRANCE
    Posts
    4,435
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil View Post
    The other way around actually, he was James II of England which is how he is usually referred to. I think most Scots, particularly the Covenanters, would prefer not to refer to him at all. Jamie the saxt (James VI of Scotland) son of Mary Queen of Scots became James I of England and on Charles II's death with no heir his brother James got the job. Confusing isn't it? Our present queen should properly be known in Scotland as Elizabeth I but somebody decided that the Scottish people have no history of any value so imposed her on them as Elizabeth II. Quite a lot of Scots don't really have much time for the whole deferential royal thing apart from those around Dee-side who make a nice living out of it. But I digress. Unfortunately Robertson, Reid & McKinnon are fairly common names and widespread throughout Scotland which makes tracking any down all the more difficult. Inverness-shire isn't too far removed from Robertson country and is the centre most folk from the isles such as McKinnons tend to head for so I think you would be safe enough assuming your Reid was one of the Robertson Reids.

    Confusing perhaps a wee bit , but fascinating none the least !

    If you come to think of anything else you are most welcome.

    Best,

    Robert
    Robert Amyot-MacKinnon

  4. #4
    thanmuwa is offline Oops, it seems this member needs to update their email address
    Join Date
    26th March 08
    Location
    Paisley, Scotland
    Posts
    228
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    And another small point, while James himself left for a nice French holiday after the Boyne (he must have been quite stressed, the battle probably ruined his nails.....), the final defeat of the Jacobites by the Papal forces under William was a bit later, at Aughrim/Limerick in 1691 as formalised by the Treaty of Limerick. This was followed by "The Flight of the Wild Geese" as we call it in Ireland. If your ancestors were amongst the Jacobite forces under Sarsfield, this could well be the route they took, after all some famous French families (Château Barton and Hennessy Cognac for example) entered France this way.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    5th November 07
    Location
    Vailly-sur Sauldre, FRANCE
    Posts
    4,435
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by thanmuwa View Post
    And another small point, while James himself left for a nice French holiday after the Boyne (he must have been quite stressed, the battle probably ruined his nails.....), the final defeat of the Jacobites by the Papal forces under William was a bit later, at Aughrim/Limerick in 1691 as formalised by the Treaty of Limerick. This was followed by "The Flight of the Wild Geese" as we call it in Ireland. If your ancestors were amongst the Jacobite forces under Sarsfield, this could well be the route they took, after all some famous French families (Château Barton and Hennessy Cognac for example) entered France this way.
    Seems logical !

    Thank You.
    Robert Amyot-MacKinnon

  6. #6
    Join Date
    3rd August 07
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    2,693
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Papal forces??? Wouldn't the Jacobites have been favorable to the Roman Church, if not actually heavily Catholic?

  7. #7
    Phil is offline Membership Revoked for repeated rule violations.
    Join Date
    13th March 07
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    2,407
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    That's right. The English invited William in precisely because he was Protestant. James was not welcome because of his conversion to Catholicism.
    Here is a bit about the Robertsons - http://www.electricscotland.com/webc.../roberts2.html

  8. #8
    thanmuwa is offline Oops, it seems this member needs to update their email address
    Join Date
    26th March 08
    Location
    Paisley, Scotland
    Posts
    228
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Galician View Post
    Papal forces??? Wouldn't the Jacobites have been favorable to the Roman Church, if not actually heavily Catholic?
    At the time, both armys were mixed, with the Jacobites being mainly composed of Irish Catholics. However, the whole conflict was really a power struggle between Louis XIV of France (supporting James) and the Pope (supporting William. This alliance was also known as the League of Augsburg). However, looked at as a purely Irish conflict, yes it was split along the expected sectarian lines :-)

  9. #9
    Join Date
    3rd August 07
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    2,693
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by thanmuwa View Post
    At the time, both armys were mixed, with the Jacobites being mainly composed of Irish Catholics. However, the whole conflict was really a power struggle between Louis XIV of France (supporting James) and the Pope (supporting William. This alliance was also known as the League of Augsburg). However, looked at as a purely Irish conflict, yes it was split along the expected sectarian lines :-)
    I did a quick search about the League (apparently aka the Grand Alliance). I saw no indication that the Papacy had any role in it. I do, however, see that the Holy Roman Emperor was. Could you be confusing them?

  10. #10
    thanmuwa is offline Oops, it seems this member needs to update their email address
    Join Date
    26th March 08
    Location
    Paisley, Scotland
    Posts
    228
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Galician View Post
    I did a quick search about the League (apparently aka the Grand Alliance). I saw no indication that the Papacy had any role in it. I do, however, see that the Holy Roman Emperor was. Could you be confusing them?
    Kind of off topic, but here are a few links:
    The obligatory wikipedia:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_Boyne
    and
    http://telusplanet.net/public/dgarneau/euro68.htm (see 1689)
    http://www.nndb.com/people/171/000094886/
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2000/ju...reland.comment

    and just for laughs, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/1582...7-of-pope.html

Similar Threads

  1. Robertson Red in cotton
    By Prester John in forum Professional Kiltmakers Hints and Tips
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 19th May 08, 07:53 PM
  2. Oh Robertson...
    By pdcorlis in forum Miscellaneous Forum
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 25th August 07, 05:35 AM
  3. Our new USA Robertson Reds
    By Prester John in forum Show us your pics
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 4th January 06, 03:22 PM
  4. Robertson Hunting
    By Prester John in forum Professional Kiltmakers Hints and Tips
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 14th November 05, 03:46 PM
  5. I'm in the ancient Robertson.
    By Ranald in forum Show us your pics
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 28th July 05, 09:01 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0