Quote Originally Posted by Mr. MacDougall View Post
This doesn't seem so bad to me. After all, one of the things we as a group have said is that where the Gold Brothers (for example) go wrong is in misrepresenting their product. We as a group have called for truth in labeling. Well, if we're to have truth in labeling, the first step is to decide what can be called a Scottish Kilt.

I don't see any indication that they're planning to shut down anyone who doesn't conform to their standard. I do see this:



Which seems to recognize that different types of kilts are being made, and that the skills related to the production of kilts need to be preserved.

Entirely aside from which, most of us are Americans, so this will have a rather limited impact on us. I anticipate that the Pakistan-made kilts that keep our supply cheap and plentiful will continue to be available. For those who want something more sophisticated, we'll still have the fine sponsors of this board, from USAKs machine-made PV, to FKs modern stylings, to Matt Newsome's hand-sewn traditional box pleats, and beyond. People like Kathy Lare and Alexis Malcolm aren't going anywhere. They may not be Scottish kilts, but they're kilts, and we love 'em.
A very reasoned response, Mr. MacDougall. I think you're spot on in this regard, especially the remarks you quoted:

"We are looking at preserving the traditional skills associated with the production of kilts in Scotland."*

*emphasis mine.

Why shouldn't the Scots be allowed to preserve their traditional skills?

Regards,

Todd