X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.
|
-
8th August 09, 12:38 PM
#19
May as well toss in my tuppence for what it's worth..
I've always associated the term as being namely a referrence for military kilts due to their weight (the 18oz & older 20/22oz weigh nearly 4lbs or more), and both the durability of the material and construction to withstand the rigours of military life and essentially wear like iron, or a tank.. ie, "It's as heavy as.." or "built like.."
As "tank" in this instance is namely a military referrence, I have always associated/used the term w/ military kilts solely.. As opposed to using it as a general referrence for any hand-stitched 16oz wool 8ydr+.. Which in my personal experience and opinion do not wear as hard nor as durable as a military kilt.
And with the higher military rise, one almost feels like they are riding in the tank's turret "un-buttoned" when wearing one.. ;)
Also, being a veteran I rather prefer the term "tank" in referrence to military kilts.
-
Similar Threads
-
By Fearnest in forum Kilts in the Media
Replies: 0
Last Post: 6th April 07, 12:25 PM
-
By davedove in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 30
Last Post: 3rd March 07, 04:54 PM
-
By McMurdo in forum Miscellaneous Forum
Replies: 6
Last Post: 30th December 06, 09:05 AM
-
By Derek in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 13
Last Post: 2nd May 06, 10:26 AM
-
By davedove in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 23
Last Post: 25th August 05, 05:58 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks