-
18th January 10, 03:48 PM
#11
he most famous Scoto-Indian of the early nineteenth century, the leader who oversaw Cherokee removal to Oklahoma, was John Ross. By blood Ross was seven-eighths Scots and one-eighth Cherokee. Educated by clergymen, he always spoke English better than Cherokee, although he understood it fluently. A visitor to Ross’s boyhood home once likened it to a Scottish manor house.
John Ross never forgot his Scottish links. During the spring of 1847 he read of the efforts of a Philadelphia organization to aid the Highland poor—estimated to number three hundred thousand—who were suffering from the potato famine. "Have the Scotch no claim on the Cherokees?" Ross asked. "Have they not a very especial claim? They have." Thus, he wrote to the Cherokee Advocate to request that the tribe meet in Tahlequah to raise money for the cause. The Cherokees met, appointed a relief committee, and in May 1847, sent $190 to a New York bank "for the relief of those who are suffering by the famine in Scotland." Many an Oklahoma Indian surname today harkens back to a distant Scottish ancestor.
-- http://www.electricscotland.com/hist...an_indians.htm
This is from an online version of Fernec Szasz's Scots in the North American West 1790-1917, University of Oklahoma Press, 2000.
T.
-
-
18th January 10, 04:48 PM
#12
Scottish Highlanders, Indian Peoples: Thirty Generations of a Montana Family
Scottish Highlanders and Indians Share Roots in Montana
Scottish history and that of Montana and its Native Americans might seem continents apart, but a book from the Montana Historical Society Press links the two in an epic tale.
Scottish Highlanders, Indian Peoples: Thirty Generations of a Montana Family traces the history of the McDonald family from the clan's emigration to the Scottish Highlands from Ireland in the ninth century to the lives of the McDonald descendants who still reside on the Flathead Reservation in Montana today.
William Farr, history professor at the University of Montana, called it "a fascinating story of mixed inheritance and cultural brokering in the Rocky Mountain West, one which will surely enrich the reader's understanding of race and identity."
In the early 1800s Angus McDonald, who had left Scotland and become a trader in the Pacific Northwest, married Catherine, who was the daughter of a Nez Perce chief.
To this happy union Angus brought the history of his clan's unsuccessful fight to remain free and independent, which included the bitter memory of a seventeenth-century governmental attempt to kill all McDonalds under age seventy.
Catherine carried the proud heritage of her people who already were locked in a desperate struggle to retain their homeland in present-day Idaho and Washington.
Both knew what it was to be faced with powerful enemies—England and the United States respectively. Both knew what it meant to be faced with their conquerers' policies of total war and the loss of the control of much of their land.
Author James Hunter, who lives in Scotland and did extensive research with the McDonalds of Montana, uncovers uncanny parallels between the fate of the native Highland clans and that of North American Indians.
Hunter begins his book near Missoula in 1877 where the Nez Perce under Chief Joseph outflanked a feeble attempt by local militia to block their entry into the Bitterroot Valley.
Present at that encounter was Angus and Catherine's son, Duncan, who wrote a history of the Nez Perce War defending the tribe's attempt to retain its freedom.
Throughout the rest of the book Hunter searches across two continents and weaves a story that colorfully links the clans of Scotland with the native people of the American West.
Joseph F. McDonald, a descendant of Angus and Catherine and president of the Salish Kootenai College in Pablo, Mont., said Hunter "shows unusual perception of Indian culture, their beliefs, and their feelings for the land in his writing of this book."
"The McDonald family is especially indebted to the author for the special attention given to the McDonalds for their part in Scottish history and their history in the Northwest," McDonald said.
The Glasgow Herald from Scotland's side of the Atlantic called it "a superb book, well researched and excitingly written."
“Don’t judge each day by the harvest you reap, but by the seeds you plant.”
– Robert Louis Stevenson
-
-
18th January 10, 05:46 PM
#13
Have always had notions of inflicting Scottish culture on Native Americans. Tartans could well be designed using the colors of their tribal seals or flags.
Here in Navajo land thought there could be some beautiful tartans created from the base colors of their traditional wool rugs. Rugs are often woven in a pattern symbolic of the geograpic area they were created in or for. Would be sort of regional tartans.
Course, as pointed out, few Navajos would have an interest.
There are over 100 Navajo clans - would be a daunting task to design tartans for each clan - and who would do it?
Hopi wear an unbifurcated garment for traditional ceremonies. The word for it is translated from Hopi to English as "kilt." But no tartan involved in its design. Hopi men weave their own kilts.
The potential is there, but the interest is not...
Ol' Macdonald himself, a proud son of Skye and Cape Breton Island
Lifetime Member STA. Two time winner of Utilikiltarian of the Month.
"I'll have a kilt please, a nice hand sewn tartan, 16 ounce Strome. Oh, and a sporran on the side, with a strap please."
-
-
18th January 10, 06:24 PM
#14
 Originally Posted by DougC
I'm for a beaded sporran!
I think this topic came up previously, and brought me to this site. I've purchased some of the patterns but they remain on the RTI ('round-to-it) list. Start with a "small purse" pattern and let your imagination take over?
Proudly Duncan [maternal], MacDonald and MacDaniel [paternal].
-
-
18th January 10, 06:45 PM
#15
The funny thing is that some Native American tribes (i.e. the Cherokee) have many members with Scottish names. They probably have as much claim to the Clan Tartans as I do. My understanding is that they are the progeny of early traders who came to live with the tribes; traders who came with the early Scots-Irish as a buffer zone between Native Americans and the plantation owners along the coast.
Search for example on Chief William McIntosh, though there were many others (Bean, Adair, etc.). My own family lived in a wigwam in Kansas in the early 1800's. As always, identity is a slippery, arbitrary thing, not bearing too much scrutiny.
 Originally Posted by MacMillan of Rathdown
Since the kilt, especially in representative tartans, is a wholly Scottish thing, it would seem to me to be in the height of poor taste to inflict it on another culture. I can see no justification, at all, for creating an "I'm an Indian" tartan, and in fact, I would view it as not only insensitive, but as highly disresectful of the people and cultures it is supposed to "honour".
If such a thing is considered "necessary" to reinforce a sense of tribal identity I expect that the tribal councils would have adopted the white man's ways years ago and created their own tartans...
-
-
18th January 10, 07:18 PM
#16
 Originally Posted by Riverkilt
Hopi wear an unbifurcated garment for traditional ceremonies. The word for it is translated from Hopi to English as "kilt." But no tartan involved in its design. Hopi men weave their own kilts.
The potential is there, but the interest is not...
with the Tewa.. which the Hopi are part of, they use a color combinaton that identifies the Pueblo.. on their dance kilts.... so like a tartan.. the pattern identifies.
“Don’t judge each day by the harvest you reap, but by the seeds you plant.”
– Robert Louis Stevenson
-
-
18th January 10, 08:23 PM
#17
Many of the tribes of the Eastern woodlands wore a kilt like garment. This was way before their exposure to Highlanders. However, this may be one of the reasons that the highlanders were so well received by tribes like the Iroquois. The other tribes that had contact with highlanders probably made good use of any kilts and plaids that became available at places like Ticonderoga and Bushy Run. I don't see why Native Americans would want a Tartan.
By Choice, not by Birth
-
-
18th January 10, 08:28 PM
#18
 Originally Posted by sydnie7
I think this topic came up previously, and brought me to this site. I've purchased some of the patterns but they remain on the RTI ('round-to-it) list. Start with a "small purse" pattern and let your imagination take over?
That site was added to my favorites! Thank you
-
-
18th January 10, 10:12 PM
#19
I agree with longhuntr regarding the quill v bead application on a bag/sporran. Quill work is rather expensive but reflects a greater (in my opinion) respect for tradition and has a element of intracacy that even seed beads can't replicate. Go for the Quillwork!
Cathy Smith is a well-known artisan, and a web search will bring up some others. Write to the Mohawk Government and ask to guided in your research.
http://www.cathyasmith.com/biography.htm
Another good source is Native Tech:
http://www.nativetech.org/quill/index.php
along with Nancy Fonicello's instruction on the same site:
http://www.nativetech.org/quill/plait.html
Regards and Best Wishes for your Journey of Discovery,
Jim aka kiltiemon
Last edited by james a. husky; 18th January 10 at 10:20 PM.
-
-
18th January 10, 11:12 PM
#20
"Many of the tribes of the Eastern woodlands wore a kilt like garment."
I'm going to disagree with that one!
Eastern woodland men usually wore a basic breechcloth held up by a belt. On the legs (given the inclination) would be worn leggings of wool or leather (like biker chaps but not with an integral waistband like modern biker chaps). The leggings would be tied to the belt (breechcloth belt) with ties.
Independent of the leggings and breechcloth (and worn in a manner that MAY give an illusion of kilt-like garment) would be a traditional long shirt (might be referred to as a "hunting shirt" or something like that. It would (just like the "sarks" worn by the scots during that period) be a long shirt that hung down to the lower thighs or just above the knee. It would often be belted or sashed around the waist giving the appearance of a "skirted" garment, when it (in reality) was just a long shirt. For more protection and heavier "shirt" or jacket would be worn over that and belted around the waist as the shirt was.
But they were not "kilts" and they were not pleated. Here's some pictures:
A 1920s Seminole long shirt:
C:\Documents and Settings\Jim Husky\My Documents\My Pictures\New Folder (2)\Seminole-garb_thumb.jpg
A long shirt attributed to Osceola:
C:\Documents and Settings\Jim Husky\My Documents\My Pictures\New Folder (2)\Seminole-garb_thumb.jpg
An image of Billy Bowles:
C:\Documents and Settings\Jim Husky\My Documents\My Pictures\New Folder (2)\seminole shirt billy bowlegsdtc_5_tif.jpg
And finally one of "Powell" or Osceola, himself:
C:\Documents and Settings\Jim Husky\My Documents\My Pictures\New Folder (2)\Seminole Osceola_Kenney_and_Hall.jpg
Notice in this one above, Osceola appears to be wearing a shorter length legging garter-tied just below the knee (though the leggings that tied from the hip were also used with (again, a matter of style) garters tied just below the knee and above the calf. Pat Wickman, in her work on Osceola, discovered that he liked to wear two pair of garters and by micro-inspection of the fibers and analysis of the knots he used to tie them discovered he was a very slight man. Quite the flashy dresser, however.
Still, no kilt!
Jim aka kiltiemon
-
Similar Threads
-
By Riverkilt in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 67
Last Post: 17th July 09, 09:06 PM
-
By Tommie in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 32
Last Post: 23rd February 09, 08:56 PM
-
By Riverkilt in forum How to Accessorize your Kilt
Replies: 17
Last Post: 29th January 08, 01:54 PM
-
By Riverkilt in forum How to Accessorize your Kilt
Replies: 9
Last Post: 8th October 04, 07:39 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks