Quote Originally Posted by cajunscot View Post


People obsess far too much about the bawdy works of Burns, INMHO. Burns was most deserving of that title, at least in my viewpoint, because of the very fact that he is celebrated the world over some 250 years after his death, and for the fact that Burns was so important in collecting the folk songs and music of Scotland at a time when it was quite unfashionable to be "Scottish".

In that regard, he is very similar to fellow folklorists such as Alan Lomax, Vance Randolph and Hamish Henderson, and deserving of the honour. Even his collection of the bawdy stuff, The Merry Muses of Caledonia, is important in that regard -- and besides, it's just darn fun to read at a gents-only Burns Supper.

Of course, being a Pisskie, I do not have the Calvinist hang-ups that James has. Just kidding, James! :mrgreen:

T.
Yes, well... even as a Calvinist, I don't think John Knox was that friendly of a guy either. I think Robert Burns did an absolutely great thing for Scotland in terms of literature and especially culture. I think Napoleon was one of the most excellent tyrants of history. But I don't think I would have gotten along with him. Robert Burns would at least have been a friendly guy to have a beer with. But I don't see him as a sort of role model upon which I would idealize a "hero". But alas, so what?