-
18th October 10, 03:29 PM
#1
 Originally Posted by CMcG
I think that opinion is predicated on the assumption that a black tie formal event would feature a smooth and elegant style of dancing. Given that this is the Traditional Highland Dress section of the forum, that is probably a fair evaluation of traditional, formal events...
Only time smooth and elegant does not apply is a mosh pit.
Every style of dance, from house to ballroom to blues, favors a lightweight shoe with a spectrum of traction ranging from the minimal grip of a skate/bmx flat to a near-gripless leather sole on a powdered floor. All favor feel rather than padding, except the skate shoes around the sides and ankles. A thick sole is a detriment when standing, since it reduces tactile sensitivity, a wide sole is a problem like MoR stated, and a sole that is both is more likely to cause a sprained ankle if you tread on someone or bring a foot down on edge when you're being athletic, even if it's just a quick side freeze, or a pause to the floor in the middle of a swipe. They just don't work. Great for walking, not so great for dancing, and I'm not talking about just that "upper deck on the Titanic" snooty style of dancing. They completely suck for swing, and they're just too clunky for blues, tango, breaking, swing, and hip hop. They're also the antithesis of classic house. They're a shoe you really have to force across a dance floor, and it's all because of a big, thick sole that's more at home on a sidewalk or in a garage. Don't get me wrong, they'll have to pry my Docs out of my cold, dead hands, but they're not dancing shoes.
There is only one environment outside of a mosh pit where that style of shoe is at all acceptable, and I don't call that dancing. More like bobbing the head with a drink in hand...and while I'm not gonna say there's anything wrong with it, there is no dancing involved whatsoever. Most people just don't dance, first out of embarrassment and second from lack of training. Dancers are made, for sure. Feet not moving? Then you're not dancing. Even close blues needs small freedom of movement and the ability to rotate in place.
 Originally Posted by MacMillan of Rathdown
A good formal shoe is like a classic Jaguar XKE while a wingtip can best be compared to a Land Rover. Like the XKE the formal shoe should be light, and allow you to move with consummate ease through the crowded conditions of a dance floor without bumping into anyone.
The problem with most wingtips is a combination of the weight of the shoe, the thickness of the sole, and the extra width of the sole extending beyond the upper portion of the shoe itself. In short they are designed to be "Land Rover" tough.
The weight of the wingtip makes it more difficult to lift the foot, while at the same time causing one to come down "harder" when placing their foot on the dance floor. The thickness of the sole makes it hard to "feel" the floor, making it necessary to lift the foot higher to glide forward (or backward) when moving around the floor. But the real killer is that extra 1/4 inch of sole sticking out all around the shoe, like the bumpers and fenders on an old car. Not only are you more than likely to scuff your partner's shoe, in all likelihood you will also trip over your shoes, especially if any sort of "footwork" is required.
Now you can find very light, designed for dancing, wingtips if you look around-- I have an old pair of patent leather wingtips with thin soles that were made in Italy and are a dream for dancing. Compared to a pair of ghillie brogues they are about half the weight.
Jaguar used to advertise their cars as the perfect blending of "Grace and Pace". The same applies to formal shoes. They should be graceful, not chunky or clunky, and make it easy for the wearer to keep up the pace when dancing.
That makes perfect sense. The wingtips I've encountered in the past, made for dancing, did not exhibit any of the detrimental characteristics you've highlighted. I've only danced in my dress shoes a couple times (regretted it both times...epic blisters), and they are fairly narrow, with a sole not noticeably beyond the sides of the shoe, and they are very lightweight. I far prefer them to a lot of what I see offered these days, which is thick & clunky in comparison...looks like I'd trip over my own feet, if I weren't walking like one of those wind-up cymbal monkeys.
At any rate, now I know specifically what to look for in a dress shoe, and why.
-
Similar Threads
-
By The Vicar in forum Kilt Advice
Replies: 28
Last Post: 17th August 10, 09:54 AM
-
By beloitpiper in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 31
Last Post: 25th October 08, 10:12 AM
-
By beloitpiper in forum Miscellaneous Forum
Replies: 30
Last Post: 16th June 08, 11:31 PM
-
By Nighthawk in forum Kilt Advice
Replies: 22
Last Post: 28th March 08, 01:01 PM
-
By Arlen in forum How to Accessorize your Kilt
Replies: 19
Last Post: 12th October 07, 11:38 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks