-
19th October 07, 07:24 PM
#1
 Originally Posted by Nick the DSM
is that a morrison??
Indeed it is. Great-Great Granny was a Gilmore. 
Morrison (ancient hue), 8 yd, 13 oz. wool, handsewn. Check out the pleating on this bad boy.

Oh, and the brown belt is also of the 2" breed.
-
-
20th October 07, 07:34 AM
#2
 Originally Posted by Tattoobradley
Indeed it is. Great-Great Granny was a Gilmore.
Morrison (ancient hue), 8 yd, 13 oz. wool, handsewn. Check out the pleating on this bad boy.
Oh, and the brown belt is also of the 2" breed.
my mother is a gillmore and thats were i get my scots blood. looks awesome man, though i like the modern version better.
i have to say the 2 incher does look good on it.
Gillmore of Clan Morrison
"Long Live the Long Shirts!"- Ryan Ross
-
-
19th October 07, 11:10 AM
#3
My normal kilt belt is 2.75", I also have a 2.25" and am about to order a second 2.25"
-
-
19th October 07, 12:02 PM
#4
I've got 2 kilt belts, one is a 2.25 inch one, and the other is a ranger belt style and 3 inches wide. It doesnt 'seem' as wide because it's a ranger belt.
It's the belt i'm wearing in
http://www.tharkis.com/images/realmenwearkilts.jpg
which doesnt 'seem' wide because of the style of belt. yet it's very comfortable, particluarly on kilts which lack straps / belt loops.
-
-
19th October 07, 03:08 PM
#5
I have three different 2.5" belts that are more for dress but my most used is my "Cavscout Big 3''er". This is a manly belt for manly men and as such is best avoided by those that do not measure up as "Men of Substance".
Gentleman of Substance
-
-
19th October 07, 05:11 PM
#6
 Originally Posted by Big Mikey
I have three different 2.5" belts that are more for dress but my most used is my "Cavscout Big 3''er". This is a manly belt for manly men and as such is best avoided by those that do not measure up as "Men of Substance".
I think it's a matter of proportion and preference. I'm 6' 1" and I like the way my 3" belt looks here:

(Does my belt make me look fat? )
Abax
-
-
20th October 07, 07:32 AM
#7
 Originally Posted by Abax
I think it's a matter of proportion and preference. I'm 6' 1" and I like the way my 3" belt looks here:
(Does my belt make me look fat?  )
Abax
yes, it makes you look sumo size, hahaha. no ya look fine.
Gillmore of Clan Morrison
"Long Live the Long Shirts!"- Ryan Ross
-
-
19th October 07, 04:16 PM
#8
I would go with at least 2". I like the look of the wider belts, 2.5 - 3, depending on the wearer.
Wallace Catanach, Kiltmaker
A day without killting is like a day without sunshine.
-
-
19th October 07, 04:23 PM
#9
I think it all depends on size and perspective, the larger you are the thicker the belt should be. I wear a casual belt that is 2" and my dress belt is 2.5".
-
-
19th October 07, 04:33 PM
#10
 Originally Posted by McMurdo
I think it all depends on size and perspective, the larger you are the thicker the belt should be. I wear a casual belt that is 2" and my dress belt is 2.5".
I agree. For larger guys, a wider belt looks more properly proportionate. A narrower belt makes one look larger. And vice versa for smaller guys.
-
Similar Threads
-
By Sean_the_Kilted in forum How to Accessorize your Kilt
Replies: 12
Last Post: 28th April 07, 04:17 AM
-
By Woodsheal in forum How to Accessorize your Kilt
Replies: 12
Last Post: 23rd January 07, 07:00 AM
-
By cavscout in forum DIY Showroom
Replies: 14
Last Post: 14th January 07, 01:15 AM
-
By Kilted KT in forum How to Accessorize your Kilt
Replies: 0
Last Post: 24th April 06, 11:32 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks