-
27th December 08, 07:56 PM
#1
 Originally Posted by Phogfan86
The Mackays and Gunns were not-so-friendly neighbors.
Their relationship waxed and wained over the years. A number of them did serve in Mackay's Regiment during the Thirty Year's War for the Swedes.
The Gunns really didn't get along with anyone too well, but they really didn't like the Keiths. In fact, it wasn't until 1976 when a "peace treaty" was signed by the Commander of the Gunns, Sir Iain Gunn of Banniskirk, and the Chief of the Kieths.
T.
-
-
28th December 08, 07:22 AM
#2
 Originally Posted by cajunscot
Their relationship waxed and wained over the years. A number of them did serve in Mackay's Regiment during the Thirty Year's War for the Swedes.
The Gunns really didn't get along with anyone too well, but they really didn't like the Keiths. In fact, it wasn't until 1976 when a "peace treaty" was signed by the Commander of the Gunns, Sir Iain Gunn of Banniskirk, and the Chief of the Kieths.
T.
The CGSNA (Texas Branch) used to have a photographic record of that event posted online. Very cool ceremony. What's very interesting, is that very often today the clan tents of Gunn and Keith will be placed right next to each other at the Highland games. I have observed this several times and the clan tents were not set up in alphabetical order.
----------------------------------------------[URL="http://www.youtube.com/sirdaniel1975"]
My Youtube Page[/URL]
-
-
28th December 08, 07:10 AM
#3
 Originally Posted by Phogfan86
The Mackays and Gunns were not-so-friendly neighbors.
They became allies in 1585. Their combined forces defeated the Earl of Caithness at the Battle of Altgowne. Mostly by the patience of the Gunn Archers for the MacKay's released their arrows too soon.
During the year of 1585 the Gunn name was outlawed and the Earl of Caithness had dispatched a force to stop the Gunns and force them to answer for their constant fighting. During that time the Gunn came to the rescue of some MacKays where some of the Earl's men were stealing MacKay cattle. After that time there is no record of any conflict (at least that I can find) between the Gunns and the MacKays. The Gunns ended up in a service dept to the Sutherlands after they were defeated at Loch Broom during this conflict. The Gunss, MacKays, and Sutherlands were all Hanoverians during the Jacobite Rebellion of 1745 "The Forty Five."
----------------------------------------------[URL="http://www.youtube.com/sirdaniel1975"]
My Youtube Page[/URL]
-
-
28th December 08, 10:37 AM
#4
 Originally Posted by sirdaniel1975
The Gunns ended up in a service dept to the Sutherlands...
That's funny! Did they wear blue smocks like Wal-Mart greeters?
Frank
-
-
28th December 08, 11:18 AM
#5
 Originally Posted by Phogfan86
The Mackays and Gunns were not-so-friendly neighbors.
I'm a Gunn (among others) and my wife is a Mackay. We used to say we were doing our part to bring the two clans together.
-
-
28th December 08, 11:52 AM
#6
Kudos to Sir William! I'm sure once the families put their dirks away, it was a lovely ceremony.
Why, a child of five could understand this. Quick -- someone fetch me a child of five!
-
-
1st January 09, 11:58 AM
#7
Well, Matt beat me to it. He is correct. There are a group of MacKays who are a sept of Clan Donald and have no relation to the northern MacKays. A lot of the Northern Ireland MacKays (or names of various spellings; e.g. MacCoy) are from Clan Donald and not from the northern group.
My humble suggestion for anyone with the name MacKay (or variation of the spelling) would be to do your research. If you're certain that your MacKays are from the northern group, I would join the Clan MacKay Society. If you can prove they are from Islay or Kintyre, I would definitely join the Clan Donald Society.
-
-
28th December 08, 05:49 AM
#8
I think it would be more accurate to say that some named MacKay were part of the Clan Donald -- it would NOT be accurate to say that the Clan MacKay itself was a sept of the MacDonalds. Remember, what clan one belonged to really had very little to do with surname and a lot to do with geography.
I find that the Clan Donald web site has much more information than most when it comes to explaining sept relationships. They do, indeed, list MacKay as a Clan Donald surname, with these notes:
Only those from Islay, Kintyre, Antrim or N. Uist. Clan Donald MacKays derive from: Gaelic Mac Aoidh - "son of Hugh". From Kintyre, to Islay. Clan Donald SOUTH. Some to N. Uist in 17th cen - Clan Donald NORTH. No relationship at all to the Northern MacKays.
-
-
28th December 08, 07:13 AM
#9
 Originally Posted by M. A. C. Newsome
I think it would be more accurate to say that some named MacKay were part of the Clan Donald -- it would NOT be accurate to say that the Clan MacKay itself was a sept of the MacDonalds. Remember, what clan one belonged to really had very little to do with surname and a lot to do with geography.
I find that the Clan Donald web site has much more information than most when it comes to explaining sept relationships. They do, indeed, list MacKay as a Clan Donald surname, with these notes:
Agreed, the name MacKay = Son of Kay (in the most basic form). Just like; not all MacDonalds are part of clan Donald.
----------------------------------------------[URL="http://www.youtube.com/sirdaniel1975"]
My Youtube Page[/URL]
-
-
28th December 08, 09:48 AM
#10
Thank you for the history gentlemen. It will help me as I continue to research.
-
Similar Threads
-
By AcuteEnigma in forum Highland Games and Celtic Event Discussion
Replies: 25
Last Post: 16th June 08, 10:10 AM
-
By Streetcar in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 3
Last Post: 17th December 05, 02:29 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks