X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.

   X Marks Partners - (Go to the Partners Dedicated Forums )
USA Kilts website Celtic Croft website Celtic Corner website Houston Kiltmakers

User Tag List

Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 68
  1. #11
    Join Date
    8th June 04
    Location
    Port Crane, New York
    Posts
    2,531
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    There is a bit of historic misconception regarding this subject. Highlanders never made some sort of rebellious decision to not wear underwear with their plaids and kilts. In fact, they wore the same kind of underwear that men did elsewhere - long shirt tails!
    Historically, a man's shirt was his basic undergarment up until the early 19th century, when separate "under drawers" began to appear. Prior to that, the shirt - which in those days was knee-length - formed one's underwear, with breeches, trousers, or the kilt. The length of the shirt kept a readily washable barrier between the body and the outer garment.
    When breeches/trouser-wearing men switched over to using actual under-drawers, the kilted Scots (mostly in the army) clung to the old habit of "shirt tails equals underwear"....
    Brian

    "They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." ~ Benjamin Franklin

  2. #12
    Join Date
    30th June 10
    Location
    San Francisco, CA, USA
    Posts
    2,182
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Woodsheal View Post
    There is a bit of historic misconception regarding this subject. Highlanders never made some sort of rebellious decision to not wear underwear with their plaids and kilts. In fact, they wore the same kind of underwear that men did elsewhere - long shirt tails!
    Historically, a man's shirt was his basic undergarment up until the early 19th century, when separate "under drawers" began to appear. Prior to that, the shirt - which in those days was knee-length - formed one's underwear, with breeches, trousers, or the kilt. The length of the shirt kept a readily washable barrier between the body and the outer garment.
    When breeches/trouser-wearing men switched over to using actual under-drawers, the kilted Scots (mostly in the army) clung to the old habit of "shirt tails equals underwear"....
    Dang, you beat me to it!!
    "It's all the same to me, war or peace,
    I'm killed in the war or hung during peace."

  3. #13
    Join Date
    23rd November 05
    Location
    Easton , PA
    Posts
    1,084
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks Woodsheal.

    Many people need to take this into consideration as they make their judgments. Throughout the years, no matter how far back you go into civilized history, we have tried to keep some form of sanitary conditions, all dependent on what was understood at the time.
    Many look at the "tradition", and want to live up to those traditions, or we can understand that time changes those "traditions" as does attitudes and knowledge surrounding them.

    Thanks for reminding us of the reality of the situation.
    Mark Dockendorf
    Left on the Right Coast

  4. #14
    Join Date
    25th December 08
    Location
    Lotus Land
    Posts
    2,193
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Canuck of NI View Post
    the CBC Radio One show known as "As It Happens" will be covering the Scottish Tartran Authority's no-commando advice this evening.
    And a fine report it was. Brian Wilton was perfectly respectful of people's decisions to go without, but spoke against the notion of brow beating people into upholding the 'no undies' fallacy. Any interpretation in the Times of the STA position being mean spirited is more likely that of the journalist and editor expressing a catchy story than Mr. Wilton or the STA getting grumpy.

  5. #15
    macwilkin is offline
    Retired Forum Moderator
    Forum Historian

    Join Date
    22nd June 04
    Posts
    9,938
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by xman View Post
    And a fine report it was. Brian Wilton was perfectly respectful of people's decisions to go without, but spoke against the notion of brow beating people into upholding the 'no undies' fallacy. Any interpretation in the Times of the STA position being mean spirited is more likely that of the journalist and editor expressing a catchy story than Mr. Wilton or the STA getting grumpy.


    Thanks to xman and Woodsheal for setting the record straight.

    T.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    6th November 08
    Posts
    198
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've been told, and I'd appreciate a reference if it's incorrect, that in the UK military that a Soldier who is either a musicain or a dancer or any other fellow who might have his modesty compromised is out of uniform if he is not wearing underwear.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    2nd October 04
    Location
    Page/Lake Powell, Arizona USA
    Posts
    14,268
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hello...."underwear" can also be an underkilt - a slip-like garment that is also unbifurcated. I wear them with my kilts to protect my kilt from me while still maintaining FREEDOM.

    Yes, some kilties say that wearing a slip-like garment under the kilt is feminine - but that makes absolutely no sense to me since it is as unbifurcated as the kilt itself. If the kilt is masculine then so is the unbifurcated underwear worn underneath the kilt.

    You can have both hygiene AND freedom - even in the kilt rental business.



    And does not Freedom Kilts still offer a very long tailed shirt for this very purpose??
    Ol' Macdonald himself, a proud son of Skye and Cape Breton Island
    Lifetime Member STA. Two time winner of Utilikiltarian of the Month.
    "I'll have a kilt please, a nice hand sewn tartan, 16 ounce Strome. Oh, and a sporran on the side, with a strap please."

  8. #18
    Join Date
    17th January 09
    Location
    The Highlands of Norfolk, England
    Posts
    7,015
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Woodsheal View Post
    There is a bit of historic misconception regarding this subject. Highlanders never made some sort of rebellious decision to not wear underwear with their plaids and kilts. In fact, they wore the same kind of underwear that men did elsewhere - long shirt tails!
    Historically, a man's shirt was his basic undergarment up until the early 19th century, when separate "under drawers" began to appear. Prior to that, the shirt - which in those days was knee-length - formed one's underwear, with breeches, trousers, or the kilt. The length of the shirt kept a readily washable barrier between the body and the outer garment.
    When breeches/trouser-wearing men switched over to using actual under-drawers, the kilted Scots (mostly in the army) clung to the old habit of "shirt tails equals underwear"....
    THANK YOU, THANK YOU, A Thousand times Thank you.

    Every kiltwearer in the world should be made to read and understand this. If they then choose to go without - fair enough. Personal choice is personal choice - some like tea, some like coffee. But I hate it like poison, when there is some pretence that going without is "Traditional" and you are not a real kilt wearer if you even contemplate wearing underwear.

    In fact, that quote should be a sticky somewhere.

    Regards

    Chas

  9. #19
    Join Date
    5th September 05
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    5,144
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I usually make the observation that they didn't have underwear back "in the day" (Woodsheal's post point this out admirably) and if they did, this wouldn't be an issue. If, however, anyone has been to a museum that proudly displayed some 18th Century jockey shorts, I'd like to know.

    Oh, to bury this issue for once and for all....

    Best

    AA

  10. #20
    Join Date
    27th September 04
    Location
    Amelia County, Virginia, USA
    Posts
    2,562
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I mostly wear black underwear under mine. The few times I don't, I wear a homemade underkilt, made from a tee shirt, as per Steve's instructions in another thread.The first time I went commando was at a Celtic Festival. It felt great and everything was cool in both senses of the word. Then I sat on a hay bale at one of the entertainment venues. All I can say is OUCH! There are tender parts which should not even come close to being exposed to dry straw.I've only gone commando a few times since that experience, and I knew the seats were soft and comfortable before I went there.
    "A day spent in the fields and woods, or on the water should not count as a day off our allotted number upon this earth."
    Jerry, Kilted Old Fart.

Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. I really dont know what to do.......
    By Kiltedfirepiper in forum Miscellaneous Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 24th May 08, 08:57 PM
  2. i really dont know
    By Skweres in forum Kilt Advice
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 14th March 07, 03:20 PM
  3. I really dont know what else can go wrong
    By Kiltedfirepiper in forum Miscellaneous Forum
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 19th December 06, 12:18 PM
  4. okay i dont understand
    By switchblade5984 in forum Miscellaneous Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 1st June 06, 04:16 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0