-
8th April 11, 09:09 AM
#1
No one likes a quitter
-
-
8th April 11, 09:27 AM
#2
Let's keep this thread clean and away from politics, gentlemen.
This is a place to talk about all the 'stuff' that can go with the Kilt.
If you just can't help yourself, I'm afraid I'll have to close it.
Thank you,
Robert
Robert Amyot-MacKinnon
-
-
8th April 11, 10:02 AM
#3
 Originally Posted by Ancienne Alliance
Let's keep this thread clean and away from politics, gentlemen.
This is a place to talk about all the 'stuff' that can go with the Kilt.
If you just can't help yourself, I'm afraid I'll have to close it.
Thank you,
Robert
With all respect, Robert, how can anyone discuss the white cockade without discussing politics? It is after all a political and religious symbol. We are not discussing blue cockades, or red, or green, or saffron, or any other colour in the spectrum. We are specifically discussing white cockades.
There are members who will wear it as a fashion item and those who wear it as a statement and those who wear it because they think is Scottish and they have to wear it. But regardless of knowledge or ignorance, the wearing of the white cockade is making a political statement.
To answer the OP's question. I see the white cockade as a Jacobite symbol and a Roman Catholic symbol. I will not wear one.
Regards
Chas
-
-
8th April 11, 10:09 AM
#4
I wear one when in my reenactor role as a 1745 Jacobite. I don't wear one with any present-day highland dress, as I think current "Jacobite" efforts are a tad on the silly/bizarre/bogus side.
This thread can only descend into a political morass...!
Brian
"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." ~ Benjamin Franklin
-
-
8th April 11, 10:37 AM
#5
 Originally Posted by Woodsheal
I wear one when in my reenactor role as a 1745 Jacobite. I don't wear one with any present-day highland dress, as I think current "Jacobite" efforts are a tad on the silly/bizarre/bogus side.
This thread can only descend into a political morass...!
Ditto.
-
-
8th April 11, 05:14 PM
#6
Perhaps some of the historians on the forum might care to give authoritative opinion as to the extent Jacobism was synonymous with Catholicism? OK, Charles was Catholic, but my reading suggests that a very significant proportion of Jacobites (including many of the gentry and at least one minister) were in fact Protestant. Given a largely protestant England and a Catholic France, one can see why labelling the Jacobites as all Catholics would have been a very useful piece of propaganda for those politically opposed to them. Anyone have provable facts?
-
-
8th April 11, 10:41 AM
#7
It's one thing to say: The cockade is a political and religious symbol; period.
This is info. Fair enough. And it's a whole other story to gives one's personnal comments and feelings about it...
So we should not "discuss the white cockade". Just give neutral encyclopedic information.
Otherwise it can very quickly degenerate into a heated debate . I'm sure this is obvious and very clear. There are many other places for this on the Internet. Not here, gentlemen.
Thank you,
Best,
Robert
Robert Amyot-MacKinnon
-
-
8th April 11, 11:10 AM
#8
I'd like to expand on my previous post and say that until this thread I had never heard of a white cockade having significance of any kind.
I doubt if one in 10,000 are aware of it in Europe, the Americas and NZ/Australia. Far fewer anywhere else.
It is silly to say it is a political or religious symbol to anyone other than those few who recognize it as such.
MEMBER: Kilted Cognoscenti
-
-
8th April 11, 11:15 AM
#9
 Originally Posted by Calico
I'd like to expand on my previous post and say that until this thread I had never heard of a white cockade having significance of any kind.
I doubt if one in 10,000 are aware of it in Europe, the Americas and NZ/Australia. Far fewer anywhere else.
It is silly to say it is a political or religious symbol to anyone other than those few who recognize it as such.
So it's use as a symbol in a historic period is "silly", and we historians are "silly" for even mentioning it? Sorry, but as an educator, I respectfully disagree.
T.
-
-
8th April 11, 11:18 AM
#10
My apologies, I did not like to use the word "silly" but could not think of the more appropriate term, which I have decided is "presumptuous".
Historical accuracy if fine. Thinking it means anything to anyone other than fellow historians is ... not reasonable.
Better?
MEMBER: Kilted Cognoscenti
-
Similar Threads
-
By pauljsharp in forum DIY Kilt and Accessories Help
Replies: 13
Last Post: 12th July 10, 05:56 PM
-
By DWFII in forum How to Accessorize your Kilt
Replies: 32
Last Post: 19th October 08, 03:09 PM
-
By Coemgen in forum Kilt Advice
Replies: 54
Last Post: 25th March 08, 07:05 PM
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks