-
3rd November 08, 04:36 PM
#1
If you've never participated in a living history event, you'll have a blast. As for your impression, just do it.
As for my impression (Assistant Surgeon), I've had quite a bit of difficulty participating in "certain" events. Some in the realm of reenacting feel that specialty impressions do not belong at events. Well, I have a difficult time trying to understand that, considering that "we're" trying to educate others on the American Civil War. And, how can we do that if, we're only focusing on one aspect of the War (i.e. an Infantryman). We need to also show them the artillery, cavalry, medical corps, Provost, spies/scouts, Adjutant, Quartermaster, etc. (I could go on and on . . but, will save everyone the torture :mrgreen . I mainly focus on living history or static displays . . and give talks about period battlefield medicine and show period medical instruments.
Just hang with your Father. He's been a reenactor long enough to know what he's doing. And, Rachel is a great resource of info about the 79th NY .
-
-
31st October 08, 01:56 PM
#2
While I agree that in basic Civil War education there is utility in portraying an average, typical soldier, I think there is a lot to be gained in demonstrating that there were many departures from the average, and that this diversity was an important factor in affecting the war and its aftermath. The "average" soldier was not female, black, southern-born, West Point educated, a Zouave, or foreign-born, but there were some, even many, in all these and other categories and they all had their duties to perform.
I find it interesting to see the changes as the war went from a gay crusade in militia parade uniforms at the beginning to the mass-produced standardizations seen in the later stages, when the combat got down to the grim business of crushing the Confederacy. Let some portray the "average", others have a different story to tell.
And remember, "If it ain't fun, then you ain't doin' it right."
"...the Code is more what you'd call 'guidelines' than actual rules."
Captain Hector Barbossa
-
-
1st November 08, 02:40 AM
#3
Here are some interesting receipts from the spring of 61 when the 79th was preparing to move on Washington city. ith:

This is a receipt for 67 gray flannel shirts made by Lewis Einstein & Co. They paid $653.25 for them. Its made out to "79th Regt N.Y.S. Mil. Lt. Col Elliott" May 27th 1861
Here is another record of the sale:

This one has always interested me. Its Im crossing my fingers that someone might know a bit about "H. Schulting" ith:
Its a receipt for what seems to be the last know tartan purchase. I love their use of "Scotch Plaid"

1,573.5 yards were purchased at $1 per yard! They returned 280 yards leaving them with the cost of $1,293.50. May 24th, 1861
-
-
6th November 08, 09:41 PM
#4
Rachel,
Got it ! Thanks--
Scott
-
Similar Threads
-
By herminator in forum Miscellaneous Forum
Replies: 5
Last Post: 11th September 07, 03:01 PM
-
By Shriner in forum Show us your pics
Replies: 8
Last Post: 5th June 07, 02:32 PM
-
By 79thReproductions in forum Traditional Kilt Wear
Replies: 16
Last Post: 15th February 07, 05:55 AM
-
By andyfg in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 8
Last Post: 30th August 06, 09:42 AM
-
By cgordon in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 1
Last Post: 20th May 04, 09:32 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks