|
-
11th August 08, 03:31 PM
#1
 Originally Posted by actualrealproperscot
..
If clans DID exist then you wouldnt be in one because you are not scottish, you just have a scottish last name.
So, what you're saying is, even if you have descent and heritage you can't be in a clan unless you're a real Scot?
Dude...
-
-
10th August 08, 12:05 PM
#2
 Originally Posted by Don Patrick
If I'm correct and if my ancestry possesses the family name that matches a sept or a clan, I submit I'm empowered to wear the tartan of that clan. I understand this to be true from the Clan Chief's web site and believe I can safetly say that several if not many others on this site agree.
Is there some flaw in my assumption?
The clan system is dead, the clan system has ceased to exist for many, many years. Clan societies etc. nowdays are nothing more than a club for people with similar sounding last names. In scotland people pick out tartans by what colours and patterns they like. ANYONE can wear any clan tartan wether they are chinese, english or scottish.
-
-
11th August 08, 12:04 AM
#3
 Originally Posted by actualrealproperscot
The clan system is dead, the clan system has ceased to exist for many, many years. Clan societies etc. nowdays are nothing more than a club for people with similar sounding last names. In scotland people pick out tartans by what colours and patterns they like. ANYONE can wear any clan tartan wether they are chinese, english or scottish.
At last someone speaking sense. I know there is a strong desire among some to feel that they somehow belong to a clan but the sad truth is that they don't exist in any meaningful form and haven't since the Highland Clearances when the then clan chieftans decided that raising sheep was a more lucrative occupation and kicked all their clan members off the land. This is hardly a good reason for anyone to feel allegiance to the descendants of those who perpetrated such disgraceful acts of betrayal against their own kinsmen but time and distance have obviously proven great healers. Clan tartans are little more than a useful way of categorising the different patterns, many devised by wealthy families grown rich on the hardship of others to wear at aristocratic balls, and a particular surname can be as useful a way of deciding which one to choose as any other.
-
-
11th August 08, 01:29 AM
#4
 Originally Posted by Phil
At last someone speaking sense. I know there is a strong desire among some to feel that they somehow belong to a clan but the sad truth is that they don't exist in any meaningful form and haven't since the Highland Clearances when the then clan chieftans decided that raising sheep was a more lucrative occupation and kicked all their clan members off the land. This is hardly a good reason for anyone to feel allegiance to the descendants of those who perpetrated such disgraceful acts of betrayal against their own kinsmen but time and distance have obviously proven great healers. Clan tartans are little more than a useful way of categorising the different patterns, many devised by wealthy families grown rich on the hardship of others to wear at aristocratic balls, and a particular surname can be as useful a way of deciding which one to choose as any other.
What both Phil and A R P S have said is the truth, rather brutally put, but, in the main, nonetheless correct. I think it would help all those with Scots Highland roots to remember these facts. For me, I wear my clan tartan and only my clan tartan because I choose to, not because I have to.
Last edited by Jock Scot; 11th August 08 at 01:53 AM.
Reason: Added something.
-
-
11th August 08, 09:14 AM
#5
With little exception, there is no "right" or "entitlement" to any tartan. If wearing a tartan you feel a connection to makes wearing a kilt easier than by all means make that your tartan rule, as others have done. There's nothing wrong deciding what symbolism your tartan represents either. No one is telling you that your wanting to connect with your heritage/clan is wrong, and no one should be telling the "I like the way it looks" crowd that they're wrong either.
Tartan was fashion before it was given any clan symbolism. The tartans, for the most part are owned by the mills, who are in the business of weaving, not clan indexing. A mill sells a lot more of each tartan by selling to anyone wanting the tartan, not just clan members. Yeah, economics plays a part in this debate too. This is why there are no "rights" or "entitlements" to tartan. Why would a mill limit who it could sell one of it's products to?
-
-
12th August 08, 01:39 PM
#6
It appears as though opinions are as plentiful as tartans--and as 'universal' ;-)
-
-
12th August 08, 03:20 PM
#7
This is an interesting thread. I am not Scot in any stretch of the imagination. And therefore have no clan association. What Tartan to wear? In talking with various "experts" on this, I found a variant of my surname affiliated with the Farquharson clan. Altho I still don't know a lot about Scottish history and how the Farquharson clan was a part of it all, I feel this is my clan and i feel it is okay to wear the tartan, should i decide to. I can appreciate traditions and customs of Scotland, so I may wear a bit of tartan rather then the whole regalia. I will respect it too if someone tells me i really have no right to wear any kind of tartan.
-
-
12th August 08, 04:01 PM
#8
An t-Ileach,
My compliments for an extraordinarily interesting and well written posting.
Best regards,
Jake
[B]Less talk, more monkey![/B]
-
-
13th August 08, 03:05 AM
#9
 Originally Posted by Monkey@Arms
An t-Ileach,
My compliments for an extraordinarily interesting and well written posting.
Best regards,
Jake
(blushes) Thanks, Jake. David
-
-
12th August 08, 04:16 PM
#10
Freedom: wear any tartan you like: clan tartan system an historical fake
What a great thread. JerseyLawyer and An t-Ileach have it right. It may be a slight excess of zeal that keeps people from wearing a tartan they cannot prove was worn by their family. The Clan tartan system is a recent fabrication, and specific tartans were not historically assigned to specific clans. The way clansmen identified each other in battle, if not by face recognition, was by plant badge or other insignia worn in the cap or headgear, not the particular tartan they wore.
Historically tartans were not assigned to families until the 19th Century, as part of Victorian fashion. Matt Newsome discusses this on his website, as he and others have pointed out, prior to the 19th Century it is impossible to establish that particular clan chiefs for whom a portrait records exists wore a specific tartan--where a portrait record exists, they show up wearing different tartans over the years. J. Charles Thompson has a concise discussion in his book So You're Going to Wear the Kilt, p. 18-26. Barb Tewksbury has a nice summary at pgs. 11-15 of her The Art of Kiltmaking.
As Tewksbury relates, many tartans were assigned to clans by the commercial weaver that produced them, giving tartans the name of the last person who ordered it. My own family tartan, MacPherson, was assigned in that fashion, when in the 19th Century the Clan Chief requested the clan tartan from the weaving house, they sent him a tartan previously named Kidd, because the last person who ordered it was a West Indies plantation owner named MacPherson. The Art of Kiltmaking, p. 14.
Perhaps one source of the feeling that one should not wear a tartan not "belonging" to ones family is that after the Act of Proscription following the '45 Jacobite uprising, wearing the kilt was outlawed except for those serving in the Highland Regiments, which sometimes differentiated themselves by adopting distinct tartans, frequently variations of the Government sett, or Black Watch tartan. I suppose one might not want to wear the tartan of a unit in which they did not serve [except Black Watch tartan, a universal] at the risk of being accused of Walting about. [However, I think that any regimental tartan should be fair game, and should be considered a Government sett, belonging to all the people].
The Lord Lyon is the governmental authority for registering the heraldry of the Scots nobility, the Lord Lyon registered the arms and insignia of the Scottish aristocracy, which heraldry did not at first include assignment of specific tartans to specific clans. Eventually, a Scottish chieftan who wished to bear arms would apply to the Lord Lyon and seek to meet the requirements thereof. The Scottish Tartans Authority is likewise a recent invention.
Family association is a good reason for wearing a particular tartan, but it is not historically accurate to take the whole clan tartan system too seriously, or to let it's existence keep you from wearing a tartan you admire.
Cheers!
"Before two notes of the theme were played, Colin knew it was Patrick Mor MacCrimmon's 'Lament for the Children'...Sad seven times--ah, Patrick MacCrimmon of the seven dead sons....'It's a hard tune, that', said old Angus. Hard on the piper; hard on them all; hard on the world." Butcher's Broom, by Neil Gunn, 1994 Walker & Co, NY, p. 397-8.
-
Similar Threads
-
By sirdaniel1975 in forum Comments and Suggestions
Replies: 6
Last Post: 20th July 07, 01:41 PM
-
By souzaphone711 in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 29
Last Post: 19th December 06, 01:24 PM
-
By Big Dave in forum Show us your pics
Replies: 13
Last Post: 9th April 06, 11:23 AM
-
By Scootter in forum Kilt Advice
Replies: 20
Last Post: 12th July 05, 08:42 AM
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks