|
-
27th June 08, 10:07 PM
#1
Personally, I find the insta-kilt to be ridiculously hilarious, as it was intended to be.
-
-
27th June 08, 11:01 PM
#2
It's the thick, matted, red armpit hair that gets me. 
[B][U]Jay[/U][/B]
[B]Clan Rose[/B]-[SIZE="2"][B][COLOR="DarkOrange"]Constant and True[/COLOR][/B][/SIZE]
[SIZE="1"][I]"I cut a stout blackthorn to banish ghosts and goblins; In a brand new pair of brogues to ramble o'er the bogs and frighten all the dogs " - D. K. Gavan[/I][/SIZE]
-
-
29th June 08, 12:52 PM
#3
"Two things are infinite- the universe, and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe." Albert Einstein.
-
-
29th June 08, 11:03 PM
#4
This "kilt" gets a bit drafty in the rear:
http://tinyurl.com/3heaoo
Last edited by gu3; 3rd July 08 at 09:00 AM.
-
-
30th June 08, 03:29 AM
#5
 Originally Posted by JRB
It's the thick, matted, red armpit hair that gets me.
I guess that's what happens when the owner inventor of the product models his own wares!
-
-
30th June 08, 11:04 AM
#6
Originally Posted by JRB
It's the thick, matted, red armpit hair that gets me.
I don't get it??!!
I don't like the towel but it is being worn by a man. Men generally have chest and arm hair. Sometimes it is thick, sometimes it's matted. That's the way nature made us. But hey it's a man...it's not a boy or a woman...what else can you expect? Why does it offend anyone?
DWFII--Traditionalist and Auld Crabbit
In the Highlands of Central Oregon
-
-
30th June 08, 12:44 PM
#7
Originally Posted by DWFII
I don't get it??!!
I don't like the towel but it is being worn by a man. Men generally have chest and arm hair. Sometimes it is thick, sometimes it's matted. That's the way nature made us. But hey it's a man...it's not a boy or a woman...what else can you expect? Why does it offend anyone?
You know, women also have armpit hair, the way nature made them...
-
-
30th June 08, 02:10 PM
#8
Originally Posted by Sylvain
You know, women also have armpit hair, the way nature made them...
Yes, I knew that...you don't get into your 6th decade and miss those kinds of details. 
I would bet, however, that if we could trace the cultural roots of women shaving their armpits and legs we would find that it originates with women themselves way back in history some time. Cosmetic embellishment and ornamentation usually does.
Think of what a uproar we would have if women had matted red chest hair though! 
DWFII--Traditionalist and Auld Crabbit
In the Highlands of Central Oregon
-
-
Originally Posted by DWFII
Yes, I knew that...you don't get into your 6th decade and miss those kinds of details.
ROFL!
Originally Posted by DWFII
Think of what a uproar we would have if women had matted red chest hair though!
EW!
-
-
2nd July 08, 09:30 AM
#10
Originally Posted by DWFII
Yes, I knew that...you don't get into your 6th decade and miss those kinds of details.
I would bet, however, that if we could trace the cultural roots of women shaving their armpits and legs we would find that it originates with women themselves way back in history some time. Cosmetic embellishment and ornamentation usually does.
Think of what a uproar we would have if women had matted red chest hair though!
Actually I have some 18th C. English sources of women plucking underarm hair to control oder.
-
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks