X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.

   X Marks Partners - (Go to the Partners Dedicated Forums )
USA Kilts website Celtic Croft website Celtic Corner website Houston Kiltmakers

User Tag List

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17
  1. #11
    Join Date
    18th October 09
    Location
    Orange County California
    Posts
    11,558
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks Peter!

    The tartan of those Donald Stewart trousers is interesting, in that the size of the red band is sort of halfway between some modern settings of Royal Stewart and the widest-red settings of PCES.

    The trews matter reminded me of the strange garment seen in this painting, trouser-like and seemingly far too tight at the bottom to put your feet through, pinked bottom edge, and worn over red & white diced hose.

    Hesketh's caption reads

    Sir John Sinclair of Ulbster by Sir Henry Raeburn, 1797, in the uniform of the Rothesay and Caithness Fencibles, of which he was Colonel Commandant.

    A great authority on Highland Dress, Sir John maintained that the most ancient form of it was trews, not the kilt, and his regiment was dressed accordingly.


    Last edited by OC Richard; 13th December 25 at 01:58 PM.
    Proud Mountaineer from the Highlands of West Virginia; son of the Revolution and Civil War; first Europeans on the Guyandotte

  2. #12
    Join Date
    2nd January 10
    Location
    Lethendy, Perthshire
    Posts
    4,804
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by OC Richard View Post
    Thanks Peter!

    The tartan of those Donald Stewart trousers is interesting, in that the size of the red band is sort of halfway between some modern settings of Royal Stewart and the widest-red settings of PCES.

    The trews matter reminded me of the strange garment seen in this painting, trouser-like and seemingly far too tight at the bottom to put your feet through, pinked bottom edge, and worn over red & white diced hose.
    Richard,

    The trews, as painted, are indeed a little strange. The bottoms are painted as though they are ragged and not seamed or bound as one might expect of something worn by a gentleman. The yellow/gold cloth around the bottom appear to have a two-button closure that would explain how the narrow angle could be fitted.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Sir John Sinclair of Ulbster (1754–1835) by Sir Henry Raeburn (1756-1823).jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	266.1 KB 
ID:	44627

    The closure reminds me of the ones of this pair of c.1820-25 trews.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Lochiel Trews-6.jpg 
Views:	8 
Size:	441.6 KB 
ID:	44628

  3. #13
    Join Date
    18th October 09
    Location
    Orange County California
    Posts
    11,558
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks, that explains how the things were put on.

    I just switched the photo to a bit clearer one, still not clear enough.

    Interesting that the trews have scalloped "cuffs" and trouser-stripes down the inner leg in the Facing Colour. I'm guessing that there would also be stripes down the outer leg, where the stripes on military trousers usually are.

    In any case those things are sort of halfway between actual trews and trousers, perhaps pointing towards the 72nd getting tartan trousers for the regiment as a whole a quarter-century on.

    Last edited by OC Richard; 13th December 25 at 02:05 PM.
    Proud Mountaineer from the Highlands of West Virginia; son of the Revolution and Civil War; first Europeans on the Guyandotte

  4. #14
    Join Date
    3rd January 06
    Location
    Dorset, on the South coast of England
    Posts
    4,546
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Fabric cut on the bias is very stretchy - it could be that the unhemmed edge was like that to make use of that to get them on and off.

    Facings on the inside of the leg might be covering a split closed with hook and eye or small buttons, like a placket to get them on and off again.

    I met up with an old friend a little while ago who was feeling a bit dismal - his mate's funeral is tomorrow.

    I was shown a photo of the mate, who worked with the RNLI, taken at a wedding and there he was wearing a kilt and there were two other men with him one in tartan trousers between the two in kilts - all in full fig, and I am guessing all ex military. I'll see if I can get a copy of the photo once things are less fraught, and any gen on who they are and if my guess about military is correct.

    I tend to think of bifurcated garments cut on the square as trousers and those on the skew are trews, having not come across ones cut half and half before - but all types are quite rare here.

    Anne the Pleater
    I presume to dictate to no man what he shall eat or drink or wherewithal he shall be clothed."
    -- The Hon. Stuart Ruaidri Erskine, The Kilt & How to Wear It, 1901.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    7th February 11
    Location
    London, Canada
    Posts
    9,606
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My friend Bert from Cupar - 1996 Yes, they're trews.

    Rev'd Father Bill White: Mostly retired Parish Priest & former Elementary Headmaster. Lover of God, dogs, most people, joy, tradition, humour & clarity. Legion Padre, theologian, teacher, philosopher, linguist, encourager of hearts & souls & a firm believer in dignity, decency, & duty. A proud Canadian Sinclair with solid Welsh and other heritage.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    13th May 25
    Location
    Oakville ON Cabafa
    Posts
    77
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by OC Richard View Post
    Thanks, that explains how the things were put on.

    I just switched the photo to a bit clearer one, still not clear enough.

    Interesting that the trews have scalloped "cuffs" and trouser-stripes down the inner leg in the Facing Colour. I'm guessing that there would also be stripes down the outer leg, where the stripes on military trousers usually are.

    In any case those things are sort of halfway between actual trews and trousers, perhaps pointing towards the 72nd getting tartan trousers for the regiment as a whole a quarter-century on.


    ... camouflage in a flowery glenn ...

  7. The Following User Says 'Aye' to Canadian Vet For This Useful Post:


  8. #17
    Join Date
    18th October 09
    Location
    Orange County California
    Posts
    11,558
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I just put together a collage showing the 72nd Highlanders and their unique Highland uniform granted in 1823.

    It combined the feather bonnet and doublet worn by the kilted Highland regiments with tartan trousers.



    Sadly this striking and unique kit was swept away in the 1881 Cardwell Reforms when the 72nd became 1st Battalion Seaforth Highlanders and switched to the uniform of the 78th, MacKenzie Seaforth kilts.
    Proud Mountaineer from the Highlands of West Virginia; son of the Revolution and Civil War; first Europeans on the Guyandotte

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0