X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.

   X Marks Partners - (Go to the Partners Dedicated Forums )
USA Kilts website Celtic Croft website Celtic Corner website Houston Kiltmakers

User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: WW1 42nd Issue

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    26th November 17
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    21
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    WW1 42nd Issue

    I'm more than a little clueless when it comes to the 42nd in WW1. As a military buff (I would never say historian, as that makes me sound stuffy) I am interested as to what they were issued in the trenches. I know the traditional dress sgian dubh would be part of a dress parade and goes back a long time before the Great War.
    Can anyone point me to a resource or at least mock me for not knowing?

    great thread by the way. Glad it's here.

  2. The Following User Says 'Aye' to sailorruss For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Join Date
    14th October 16
    Location
    Goderich ont
    Posts
    122
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The typical Highland soldier be he in the Gordons or Black Watch, would not have carried a sgian dubh in the trenches and most likely was never issued one. Most kit taken to the trenches was deemed necessary for fighting and would need to serve a purpose. Pipers and officers in kilts carried them for prestige on occasion, but the jocks did not as a norm.

  4. #3
    Join Date
    19th October 17
    Location
    Fountain Hills AZ
    Posts
    176
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by 48HofC View Post
    The typical Highland soldier be he in the Gordons or Black Watch, would not have carried a sgian dubh in the trenches and most likely was never issued one. Most kit taken to the trenches was deemed necessary for fighting and would need to serve a purpose. Pipers and officers in kilts carried them for prestige on occasion, but the jocks did not as a norm.
    Did the grunts carry any blades?
    American by birth, human by coincidence and earthling by mistake.

  5. #4
    Join Date
    26th November 17
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    21
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    As long as it doesn't violate the rules I have an interesting piece on WW1 knives, ETC, that I can put up a link to.

    The boiled down version is this: There was no UK issue. All were privately bought or made in the trenches.

  6. #5
    Join Date
    6th July 07
    Location
    The Highlands,Scotland.
    Posts
    15,798
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by macmanjim View Post
    Did the grunts carry any blades?
    Apart from the bayonet which was of course issued. Personal pocket knives were often carried and assorted "trench knives" none of which were issued as far as I am aware.
    " Rules are for the guidance of wise men and the adherence of idle minds and minor tyrants". Field Marshal Lord Slim.

  7. #6
    Join Date
    2nd May 08
    Location
    Mandurah, Western Australia
    Posts
    701
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    There was the "clasp knife" pattern 6353/1905 with blade, marlin spike and can opener which I believe was a general issue item.

    Last edited by Bruce Scott; 8th December 17 at 05:11 PM.

  8. The Following 2 Users say 'Aye' to Bruce Scott For This Useful Post:


  9. #7
    Terry Searl is offline Registration terminated at the member's request
    Join Date
    13th September 07
    Location
    Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    546
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    late teens

    Quote Originally Posted by Bruce Scott View Post
    There was the "clasp knife" pattern 6353/1905 with blade, marlin spike and can opener which I believe was a general issue item.

    When I was a young fellow in my late teens I was working in construction with a blasting crew. We used these knives for cutting the stick of powder to what ever length we wanted and the marlin spike was use to punch a hole in the end of the "stick" to insert the blasting cap. I don't know what the military used them for but they were a perfect tool used in blasting

  10. #8
    Join Date
    18th October 09
    Location
    Orange County California
    Posts
    11,408
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by sailorruss View Post
    I know the traditional dress sgian dubh would be part of a dress parade and goes back a long time before the Great War.
    You may know this already, but your question isn't completely clear, so I'll point out that sgian dubhs are worn by officers and pipers but not by ordinary Other Ranks soldiers.

    Sgians were called for in a number of different orders of dress worn by officers, not only when on Parade.

    Numerous photos from WWI, WWII, and other wars show some officers wearing sgian dubhs with their combat dress in war zones.

    These are comments about Highland battalions in general- I read that officers of The Black Watch, in contrast to the other Highland regiments, only wear the sgian dubh in orders of dress where diced full hose and buckled brogues are worn, such as Levee Dress. In other Highland regiments officers wear sgian dubhs in Full Dress and Service Dress.

    BTW strictly speaking there was no "42nd" in WWI, due to the 1881 Cardwell reforms which amalgamated pairs of the traditional numbered regiments into new 2-battalion regiments known by names, not numbers. Thus in 1881 the 42nd Foot and the 73rd Foot became the first and second battalions The Black Watch.

    Different war, different regiment, but here are officers of The Argyll & Sutherland Highlanders wearing sgian dubhs in Korea

    Last edited by OC Richard; 9th December 17 at 04:09 AM.
    Proud Mountaineer from the Highlands of West Virginia; son of the Revolution and Civil War; first Europeans on the Guyandotte

  11. The Following User Says 'Aye' to OC Richard For This Useful Post:


  12. #9
    Join Date
    26th November 17
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    21
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks for the great photos of those knives. The first one is interesting. It looks to me, and I'm just learning about this, that the first one in line was modified with horn. No? They don't look like they would be practical for combat. More an everyday knife.

    Also I wasn't really thinking about reorganization of units either. As a guy who knows a lot about the US military I should have thought that. Learn something new everyday. I'm going to have to read up on this or hang up my kilt!

    Also, from what I can gather from the thread is that sgian dubh wasn't issue to the men in the trenches, but carried by officers anyway.
    Last edited by sailorruss; 8th December 17 at 08:31 PM.

  13. #10
    Join Date
    2nd May 08
    Location
    Mandurah, Western Australia
    Posts
    701
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by sailorruss View Post
    Thanks for the great photos of those knives. The first one is interesting. It looks to me, and I'm just learning about this, that the first one in line was modified with horn. No? They don't look like they would be practical for combat. More an everyday knife.
    Yes, they were simple, everyday utility knives. There is some further information here on the handles: https://www.allaboutpocketknives.com...pic.php?t=6951

    A similar thing was still being issued to every Australian soldier when I was serving (1967-93):

    Last edited by Bruce Scott; 8th December 17 at 10:39 PM.

  14. The Following User Says 'Aye' to Bruce Scott For This Useful Post:


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0