A Question for the Experts: What are your favorite old setts?

[creagdhubh]

Oh it does exist - look!



However, notwithstanding the label, nor the claims elsewhere, this is not an early C18th piece but rather a piece of Wilsons' cloth 1790-c1800 and is listed in their 1819 Key Pattern Book as MacKintosh. The label's reference to King George IV wearing this is also incorrect and both are examples of family traditions being attached to artefacts, portraits etc which are later taken as 'fact'.

This sample is in the West Highland Museum at Fort William and I have no doubt that it is the piece that later authors, DC Stewart and James Scarlett cite as the Crubin Plaid. DC Stewart apparently examined it in 1947 but clearly missed the fact that there are both wool and silk yellow stripes in the specimen, something never found in truly old pieces but often seen in early Wilson setts and in this case actually specified in their 1819.

So, I'm afraid that whilst it may be a very attractive old tartan, it does not meet the criterion of the OP.

Thanks Peter!

I have seen this particular sample (in person I might add) of the 'Crubin Plaid' before, however, this is not what I am referring to. The version that is discussed most amongst Macphersons and Clan Macpherson historians, is a bit of hard tartan apparently woven sometime during the 18th-century (maybe earlier), and discovered in the 18th-century. The sample shown above is more than likely a variant of what was originally discovered in Badenoch. Naturally, since the tartan 'craze' was on, Wilson's took it from there, and of course much later, DC Stewart and James Scarlett added their assumptions of the cloth.

Bottom line, to us Macphersons, we definitively believe that an early 18th-century (or maybe earlier) piece of tartan cloth, now cited as the 'Macpherson Crubin plaid,' indeed existed, BUT, naturally, we have no concrete evidence of such a cloth - ONLY a written and spoken account passed down within the Clan Macpherson; specifically through the cadet branch of Slioch'd Gillosa, also referred to as the Macphersons of Invereshie.

I have edited my original post to reflect that there is indeed a later reproduction, in my opinion, of the original 'Macpherson Crubin plaid,' on display in the West Highland Museum at Fort William - I completely forgot about this, as I was last there in 2008.

Cheers,

[figheadair]

Thanks Peter!

I have seen this particular sample (in person I might add) of the 'Crubin Plaid' before, however, this is not what I am referring to. The version that is discussed most amongst Macphersons and Clan Macpherson historians, is a bit of hard tartan apparently woven sometime during the 18th-century (maybe earlier), and discovered in the 18th-century. The sample shown above is more than likely a variant of what was originally discovered in Badenoch. Naturally, since the tartan 'craze' was on, Wilson's took it from there, and of course much later, DC Stewart and James Scarlett added their assumptions of the cloth.

Bottom line, to us Macphersons, we definitively believe that an early 18th-century (or maybe earlier) piece of tartan cloth, now cited as the 'Macpherson Crubin plaid,' indeed existed, BUT, naturally, we have no concrete evidence of such a cloth - ONLY a written and spoken account passed down within the Clan Macpherson; specifically through the cadet branch of Slioch'd Gillosa, also referred to as the Macphersons of Invereshie.

Cheers,

And there in lies the problem for me as a tartan historian. Unfortunately heresey without proof is little more than myth. The piece I posted is (incorrectly) claimed to be the Crubin plaid. My mistake earlier, the image you posted is of the Crubin plaid said to have been examined by DCS in 1947. Unfortunately he doesn't say where it was but I have seen other pieces that he examined and recorded completely incorrectly so I remain very sceptical about the supposed original piece.

[creagdhubh]

And there in lies the problem for me as a tartan historian. Unfortunately heresey without proof is little more than myth. The piece I posted is (incorrectly) claimed to be the Crubin plaid. My mistake earlier, the image you posted is of the Crubin plaid said to have been examined by DCS in 1947. Unfortunately he doesn't say where it was but I have seen other pieces that he examined and recorded completely incorrectly so I remain very sceptical about the supposed original piece.

I agree. It can prove difficult in distinguishing fact from myth, especially when so many people (the Macphersons) are in agreement in regards to the history of the Macpherson Crubin plaid. Unless the original specimen turns up, and is properly examined by the appropriate experts and historians, such as yourself, I'm afraid the original, 18th-century (perhaps pre-18th-century) Macpherson Crubin plaid, all but remains a myth.

As always, thanks for your expertise, Peter!

Warmest regards,